Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 19;11:197. doi: 10.1186/s13148-019-0794-y

Table 3.

Differentially methylated CGI tiles found in all pair-wise comparisons

Comparison Total CGI tiles (p value < 0.05) Genes associated with Hypomethylated CGI (≥ 20% methylation difference) Genes associated with Hypermethylated CGI (≥ 20% methylation difference)
IFC vs. SO 85 Fzd5, Phf19, Kctd8, Repin1, Iqsec1, Foxp1, Fgfr1, Cnot7, Gm20388, Col13a1, Jmjd1c, Foxred2, Ccnd3, Kcnn2, Csf2ra Qtrt1, Fam100b, Pick1
SO vs. SOA 107 Slc12a5, Kctd8, Fbxl3 Casz1, Ncor1, Tmem121, Ryr2, Sfrp5
SOA vs. IV 60 Nkpd1, Bcan, Krt7, Ncor1, Golim4, Manf

The experimental group in bold is considered the control in the comparison, while the other group is hyper or hypomethylated. The underlined gene names are those previously identified by the 100 CpG window unbiased analysis