Table 2.
Patient descriptions
| ID | Age | MMSE or HDS-R score | Onset (years prior to the study) | Functional autonomy | How did the patient learn about BT and make a decision? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 45–49 | MMSE = 24 | 5 | Could go out with a cane and a lower extremity orthosis. | BT was introduced by the primary physician. |
| Patient selected BT injection to enhance gait stability and improve upper limb activity. | |||||
| B | 55–59 | MMSE = 29 | 10 | Could go out with a cane and a lower extremity orthosis. | BT was introduced by the primary physician. |
| Patient selected BT injection to enhance gait stability and improve upper limb activity. | |||||
| C | 60–64 | HDS-R = 26 | 4 | Could go out. | BT recommended for a tingling sensation in the foot. |
| Patient did not select BT injection owing to the possibility of convulsions. | |||||
| D | 60–64 | MMSE = 28 | 8 | Could go out with a cane and a lower extremity orthosis under supervision. | Patient was looking for better treatment options and obtained information about BT. |
| Selected BT injection to enhance gait stability and improve upper limb activity. | |||||
| E | 60–64 | HDS-R = 26 | 9 | Could go out with a cane and a lower extremity orthosis. | Patient heard about BT from patients who had received BT and healthcare professionals. Selected BT injection to enhance gait stability. |
| F | 70–74 | MMSE = 26 | 6 | Could go out with a cane and a lower extremity orthosis under supervision. | BT recommended by healthcare professionals and family members. |
| Selected BT injection to enhance gait stability and improve upper limb activity. |
BT Botulinum toxin, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, HDS-R Revised Hasegawa’s Dementia Scale