Table 3.
Ranking of outcomes in the study population
Main analysis | Sensitivity analysis 1 | Sensitivity analysis2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conditional logit parameters | Best-minus-worst scores | SUCRA scores | ||||
Outcomes | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE |
Stroke | 3.19 | 0.09 | −2.63 | 0.12 | 0.989 | 0.002 |
Heart attack | 2.75 | 0.09 | −1.91 | 0.13 | 0.800 | 0.014 |
Heart failure | 2.73 | 0.09 | −2.04 | 0.13 | 0.800 | 0.010 |
End stage renal disease (Dialysis) | 1.95 | 0.09 | −0.68 | 0.15 | 0.571 | 0.014 |
Cognitive impairment | 1.92 | 0.09 | −0.54 | 0.15 | 0.562 | 0.003 |
Chronic kidney disease | 1.87 | 0.08 | −0.60 | 0.10 | 0.664 | 0.009 |
Acute kidney injury | 1.38 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.434 | 0.017 |
Fainting | 0.44 | 0.08 | 1.63 | 0.11 | 0.117 | 0.016 |
Injurious fall | 0.09 | 0.08 | 2.16 | 0.14 | 0.232 | 0.015 |
Low blood pressure with dizziness | 0.06 | 0.08 | 2.18 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.03 |
Treatment burden | 0a | 2.35 | 0.14 | 0.253 | 0.007 |
Parameters from conditional logit regression (on log scale) with treatment burden as a reference (main analysis), mean best-minus-worst scores with a possible range of [−5,5] (sensitivity analysis 1), SUCRA scores with a possible range of [0,1] (sensitivity analysis 2).
aTreatment burden was chosen as the reference, as it was the least worrisome outcome, so all parameters would be positive
SE Standard error, SUCRA Surface under the cumulative ranking curve