Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 4;9(12):e030346. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030346

Table 4.

Logistic and LASSO regression analyses of candidate predictors of endometriosis

Candidate predictors Univariable logistic regression Multivariable logistic regression Logistic regression with backward stepwise selection‡ LASSO regression
B OR (95% CI) B OR (95% CI) B OR (95% CI) B (95% CI)
Intercept −2.6 0.1 (0.0 to 0.9) −1.5 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3) −1.5 (−4.3 to −0.5)
Age at menarche (years) −0.1 0.9 (0.8 to 1.0) 0.1 1.1 (0.9 to 1.3)
Severe dysmenorrhea* (cont.) 0.8 2.2 (1.8 to 2.8) 0.2 1.2 (0.9 to 1.8) 0.1 (0.0 to 0.5)
Absenteeism from school† (cont.) 1.1 3.0 (2.2 to 3.9) 0.9 2.5 (1.6 to 3.7) 1.1 3.0 (2.3 to 4.1) 0.8 (0.5 to 1.2)
Use of painkillers† (ref. never/rarely)
 Sometimes 0.9 2.3 (1.2 to 4.5) −0.2 0.8 (0.4 to 2.0)
 Often/always 2.3 9.8 (5.2 to 18.7) 0.2 1.3 (0.5 to 3.5) 0.3 (0.0 to 1.0)
Use of oral contraceptives† 1.6 4.8 (2.6 to 8.8) 0.1 1.1 (0.5 to 2.6)
Family history of endometriosis 2.2 8.7 (3.2 to 23.5) 2.2 9.4 (2.9 to 30.6) 2.3 9.5 (3.1 to 29.2) 1.7 (1.0 to 3.0)

Only participants with complete data for the candidate predictors (154 cases and 145 controls) were included in the analyses.

*Experienced in adolescence.

†Due to dysmenorrhea in adolescence.

‡Backward stepwise variable selection was performed using Wald test statistics with p≤0.157 as the criterion for inclusion.

cont., continuous; LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; ref., reference.