Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan;26(1):90–96. doi: 10.3201/eid2601.191085

Table 2. ELISA- and HAI-positive results for tick-borne encephalitis virus from counties from which serum samples were submitted, United Kingdom*.

County and country ELISA
HAI
No. positive/no. tested % Positive (95% CI)† No. positive/no. tested % Positive (95% CI)†
Norfolk, England 18/35 51.43 (35.57–67.01) 16/35 45.71 (30.46–61.82)
Hampshire, England 15/105 14.29 (8.74–22.35) 14/104 13.46 (8.07–21.46)
Suffolk, England 3/28 10.71 (2.90–28.01) 2/28 7.14 (0.90–23.73)
Highland, Scotland 7/81 8.64 (3.99–17.04) 8/81 9.88 (4.86–18.53)
Perth and Kinross, Scotland 2/33 6.06 (0.68–20.60) 10/33 30.30 (17.25–47.46)
Dorset, England 2/72 2.78 (0.19–10.15) 0/70 0.00 (0.00–6.23)
Cumbria, England 2/95 2.11 (0.12–7.81) 4/95 4.21 (1.31–10.67)
Argyll and Bute, Scotland 3/158 1.90 (0.40–5.69) 5/158 3.16 (1.16–7.39)
Wiltshire, England 1/56 1.79 (0.00–10.34) 5/55 9.09 (3.53–19.99)
Stirling, Scotland 0/2 0.00 (0.00–70.98) 1/2 50.00 (9.45–90.55)
Somerset, England 0/13 0.00 (0.00–26.59) 1/13 7.69 (0.00–35.42)
Moray, Scotland 0/19 0.00 (0.00–19.79) 1/19 5.26 (0.00–26.48)
Gloucestershire, England 0/24 0.00 (0.0016.31) 1/24 4.17 (0.00–21.87)
Aberdeenshire, Scotland 0/32 0.00 (0.00–12.73) 1/32 3.13 (0.00–17.11)

*HAI, hemagglutination inhibition.
†95% CIs computed by Agresti Coull method.