Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 20;9:19535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55828-x

Table 5.

Literature review — secondary macular hole formation after vitrectomy in different studies.

Authors,
Journal (Year)
Secondary MH after PPV, Eyes (Incidence) Mean Age, Years ± SD (Range) Most Common Diagnosis, Eyes (%) Mean Interval Between Primary PPV and MH Diagnosis, Month (Range) ERM/CME Detected Prior to MH Diagnosis, Eyes (%) High Myopia, Eyes (%) MH Surgical Outcomes: Successful Closure Rate/Rate of Multiple Operations Final Visual Outcome, Snellen’s VA (range):
Change in VA
Study Conclusions and Key Findings

Lee et al.2,

Retina (2010)

10 (0.2% over 5.3 years)

56 ± 16

(27–78)

RD 5 (50%); VH due to PDR 4 (40%); Idio-pathic ERM 1 (10%)

26

(0.6–168)

ERM 4 (40%)/CME 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 9 (90%) closed/0 multiple ops

20/460 (20/21 to counting fingers): 2-line decrease,

2 eyes (20%)

Relatively favourable outcomes, final VA dependent on underlying ocular pathology.
Garcia-Arumi et al.18, Retina (2011) 14 (0.6% after RD repair over 13 years)

52

(29–70)

Macula-off RD 14 (100%)

11

(0.8–78)

ERM 45% overall/CME no data 3 (21%) 14 (100%) closed/0 multiple ops 20/100 (20/28–20/400): 14 (100%) improved compared to pre-op Favourable MH closure rate, though limited functional VA outcome.
Schlenker et al.3, Can J Ophthalmol (2012) 9 (0.9% after RD repair over 4.5 years)

49

(9–73)

RD 9 (100%): macula-off 8 (89%), re-current 5 (56%)

median 4

(0.07–22)

ERM 2 (22%)/CME no data 1 (11%) 8 (89%) closed/2 (22%) multiple ops

20/200 (20/50 to counting fingers): 1-line increase,

5 eyes (56%)

CME may play a prominent role. Favourable MH closure rates, though visual prognosis remains guarded.
Fabian et al.8, Retina (2012) 7 (1.1% after RD repair over 4.5 years)

60 ± 10

(50–79)

RD 7 (100%): macula-off 3 (30%)

20

(1–48)

ERM 2 (29%)/CME none (no data) 5 out of 7 (71%) closed/1 (14%) multiple ops 20/74 (20/25–20/480): 3 (43%) improved compared to pre-op Suggests iatrogenic trauma during PPV, vitreoschisis, ILM traction may cause secondary MH.
Gao et al.10, Am J Ophthalmol (2013) 8 (19% after foveoschisis repair over 10 years)

69 ± 13

(51–83)

Myopic foveoschisis (100%)

1.6

(1–3)

(no data) Myopia >6D or AXL >26.5 mm: 8 (100%) (no data) (no data) Chorioretinal atrophy/posterior staphyloma not significant. Loss of IS/OS line integrity risk factor for secondary MH development.

Medina et al.11,

Retina (2017)

15 (no data on incidence)

64

(50–86)

RD 15 (100%): macula-off 9 (60%), re-current 9 (60%)

4

(1–13)

ERM 11 (73%)/CME none Myopia >6D or AXL >26.5 mm: 5 out of 9 (56%) 11 (73%) closed/7 (47%) multiple ops 20/267 (20/60 to hand motions): 2-line increase, 8 eyes (53%) Secondary MH may be associated with ERM, macula-off RD, recurrent RD, and high myopia. Limited visual improvement even after MH closure.

Khurana et al.14,

Retina (2017)

14 (no data on incidence)

61

(43–71)

RD 14 (100%): macula-off RD 6 (43%)

median 15

(1–78)

ERM 14 (100%)/CME none (no data) 12 out of 12 (100%) closed/0 multiple ops 20/25 (20/20 to counting fingers): 13 (93%) improved compared to pre-op ERM may play a role in the pathogenesis of MH.

Kang et al.,

Present Study

38 (0.6% over 10 years)

57 ± 15

(18–77)

RD 9 (23.7%) with 5 macula-off; secondary ERM 6 (15.8%)

median 2.3

(0.04–91)

ERM 19 (50%)/CME none AXL >28 mm: 6 (15.8%) 34 out of 36 (94%)/10 (28%) multiple ops 20/86 (20/25 to counting fingers): 3-line increase, 18 (47%) Occurs most commonly after RD repair, associated with ERM. AXL ≥28 mm and poor BCVA at 3 months associated with limited outcome. History of macula-off RD risk factor for multiple surgeries for MH closure.

AXL = axial length; BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; CME = cystoid macular oedema; ERM = epiretinal membrane; ILM = internal limiting membrane; IS/OS = inner segment/outer segment; MH = macular hole; RD = retinal detachment; PDR = proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PPV = pars plana vitrectomy; SD = standard deviation; VA = visual acuity; VH = vitreous haemorrhage.