Table 7.
Top 10 largest percent change in global efficiency upon removal of a node in HC and AD using the graphical lasso.
| Node | RSN | HC Baseline | HC One-year | AD Baseline | AD One-year | AD − HC Baseline | AD − HC One-year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 207 | FPR | −0.83 | −0.93 | −0.86 | −0.82 | −0.02 | 0.12 |
| 259 | Unk | −0.79 | −0.84 | −0.92 | −0.89 | −0.13 | −0.04 |
| 252 | Unk | −0.79 | −0.91 | −0.86 | −0.85 | −0.07 | 0.06 |
| 149 | EC | −0.8 | −0.88 | −0.89 | −0.8 | −0.09 | 0.09 |
| 211 | FPR | −0.8 | −0.89 | −0.79 | −0.77 | 0 | 0.12 |
| 51 | DMN | −0.81 | −0.82 | −0.88 | −0.81 | −0.07 | 0.01 |
| 143 | EC | −0.8 | −0.88 | −0.83 | −0.79 | −0.03 | 0.09 |
| 195 | FPL | −0.84 | −0.88 | −0.88 | −0.85 | −0.04 | 0.03 |
| 208 | FPR | −0.76 | −0.88 | −0.81 | −0.82 | −0.05 | 0.06 |
| 164 | EC | −0.82 | −0.84 | −0.88 | −0.79 | −0.06 | 0.05 |
Positive (negative) values indicate that removal of this node increased (decreased) the global efficiency. The final two columns display the difference in percent change between AD and HC at that node at baseline and at one-year.