Table 3.

Quantitative evaluation about panorama results (43 volunteers). We evaluate the error score between Liu's [18] method and our method. The overall texture error of ours is 0.33, which is much better than [18]. Moreover, we also evaluate the results on angularis, antrum, and stomach body, respectively, and our method is better.

	Texture metric error
	Angularis	Antrum	Stomach body	Overall
Liu's method [18]	0.53	0.49	0.44	0.49
Our method	0.38	0.35	0.27	0.33