Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 21;19:986. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4801-y

Table 2.

Rotation component matrix

Items Component
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7
X1 National financial allocations 0.850
X2 Extent of national policy support 0.838
X3 Extent of policy support for family doctor service 0.801
X4 Government propaganda 0.745
X5 Local government’s investment in special funds for contracted family doctor service 0.708
X6 Extent of reduction in the incidence of disease because of patients/ consumers signing up for this service 0.850
X7 Extent of reduction in patients/consumers’ medical costs because of signing up for this service 0.817
X8 Extent of improvement in the convenience of medical treatment because of signing up for this service 0.736
X9 Extent to which community patients/consumers trust their family doctors 0.723
X10 Patients/consumers are satisfied with the contracted services 0.690
X11 A good medical environment 0.609
X12 Extent to which patients/ consumers respect, support, and cooperate with family doctors 0.602
X13 Extent of contracted doctors’ general medical knowledge and mastery of skills 0.857
X14 Degree of contracted doctors’ health management knowledge and skills 0.775
X15 Extent of the increase in workload 0.585
X16 Situation of the first diagnosis of the patients/consumers 0.488
X17 Awareness of family physician policy 0.790
X18 Self-working ability 0.726
X19 Follow the family doctor’s wishes 0.706
X20 Degree of development of informatization of community medical institutions 0.837
X21 Completeness of the performance assessment mechanism of the family physician in the community 0.717
X22 Community medical equipment update and supplement situation 0.711
X23 Situation that the resident gives the family doctor subsidy after signing a contract 0.814
X24 Incentive mechanism 0.683
X25 Recognition of work by the leadership 0.541