Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 2;116(51):25412–25417. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909842116

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Reconstruction of the bubble pinch-off in a turbulent flow from 2 views, with dn=2.7mm and ϵ=1,500cm2/s3. (A) Large-scale view of the bubble in the first frame after pinch-off, where the green and blue dashed regions indicate the 2 fields of view (separated by a 90 angle) in the xz and yz planes. Colored lines indicate various vertical planes used for the vertical analysis of the neck. (B) Close-up views at various times showing that the thinnest neck position does not move vertically and that both views exhibit necks of different sizes. Movie S1 shows the collapse. (C) Neck diameters dx and dy in the 2 views during the pinch-off. The 2 do not superpose, hence breaking the circular invariance. While the individual time evolution of dx and dy does not exhibit self-similar pinch-off, the mean diameter (red) follows a self-similar scaling, d¯(t0t)α, with α=0.55 fitted to the data (black dotted line), which are very close to the values observed for bubble pinch-off in still water and predicted theoretically. (D) Difference Δr=(dxdy)/2 as a function of time t0t. The oscillating behavior can be described up to t0t0.1 ms by the dynamics of an elliptical perturbation indicated in dashed lines [reconstructed using Eq. 1, with b2(t=t010ms)=24μm and b˙2(t=t010ms)=3.2 mm/s]; this is also shown in colored dashed lines in C. (E) Snapshots of the neck shape reconstructed with Eq. 1 (orange; solid lines) and the mean circular shape (black; dotted lines) during the collapse. (F) Difference Δr=(dxdy)/2 as a function of the mean neck diameter d¯(t,z) for the different vertical neck planes z, with the colors corresponding to the slices shown with the similarly colored line in A. When plotted against the local average neck size, different slices of the neck evolve in phase with each other and exhibit similar oscillatory behavior, showing that no vertical dynamics take place.