Table 5.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |
Structural stigma | 1.20 (1.11, 1.30) | 1.07 (0.99, 1.16) | 0.97 (0.89, 1.05) |
Year | 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) | 0.97 (0.96, 0.98) | 0.97 (0.96, 0.97) |
Age at Interview | 1.06 (1.05, 1.06) | 1.06 (1.05, 1.06) | |
Black | 1.68 (1.49, 1.89) | 1.50 (1.31, 1.71) | |
Other Race | 1.16 (0.92, 1.46) | 1.16 (0.92, 1.46) | |
Female | 0.68 (0.63, 0.73) | 0.66 (0.61, 0.72) | |
Not US Born | 0.79 (0.66, 0.95) | 0.78 (0.64, 0.94) | |
Household Income (log transformed) | 0.87 (0.83, 0.92) | ||
Years of Education | 0.97 (0.95, 0.98) |
Notes. HR = Hazard Ratio. CI = Confidence Interval. Structural stigma was examined as a continuous variable using the complete cases dataset. White is the reference category for the race variables.