Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 8;18:100262. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100262

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of the blended and face-to-face parent training condition and analyses of differences.

Blended Face-to-face Differences between conditions e p
Demographics child a
 Age: mean (SD) 7.46 (2.21) 8.10 (1.85) U = 47.5 0.61
 Gender: male, n (%) 7 (63.6) 8 (80.0) 0.64
 IQ: mean (SD) b 96.8 (15.5) 96.7 (11.8) U = 40.5 1.00
 CBCL at baseline: mean (SD) c 21.3 (11.3) 27.1 (2.81) t = 1.65 0.13
Comorbid child problems
 SDQ Emotional: mean (SD) 2.73 (1.74) 3.90 (1.79) U = 33.5 0.13
 SDQ Peer problems: mean (SD) 1.64 (1.63) 2.80 (1.81) U = 43.5 0.15
Comorbid clinical child diagnoses: n (%) FFH = 4.64 0.33
 No comorbid diagnoses 7 (63.6) 9 (90)
 Disruptive behavior disorder 2 (18.2) 0 (0)
 Tourette's disorder 1 (9.1) 0 (0)
 Disruptive behavior disorder and Tourette's disorder 1 (9.1) 0 (0)
 Anxiety disorder 0 (0) 1 (10)
Family characteristics
 Single parent family, n (%) 2 (18.1) 4 (40) 0.36
 Educational level: n (%) d FFH = 2.11 0.45
 Low 1 (18.2) 2 (30)
 Middle 6 (54.5) 7 (60)
 High 4 (27.3) 1 (10)

Note: n blended parent training = 11; n face-to-face parent training = 10; CBCL: Child Behavior Checklist.

a

One child in the blended condition, who met diagnostic criteria for ADHD, had a postponed ADHD diagnosis.

b

IQ: n blended parent training = 9; n face-to-face parent training = 9.

c

Range blended parent training = 7–46; range face-to-face parent training = 23–32.

d

Concerns the educational level of the parent with the highest educational level in the household. Low = no education, primary school, lower vocational and lower secondary education; middle = intermediate and higher secondary education; high = higher education.

e

FFH: Fisher-Freeman-Halton test statistic. Gender and Single parent family were compared between conditions with Fisher's exact test. Since this test does not provide a test statistic, only the p value has been reported.