Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 3;16(23):4875. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234875

Table 3.

The P2TLN decision matrix by the third expert Θ(3).

Alternatives κ1 κ2 κ3 κ4
N1 <(s1, 0), (0.4, 0.3)> <(s0, 0), (0.2, 0.6)> <(s5, 0), (0.8, 0.6)> <(s3, 0), (0.2, 0.1)>
N2 <(s4, 0), (0.2, 0.6)> <(s2, 0), (0.5, 0.5)> <(s3, 0), (0.6, 0.6)> <(s2, 0), (0.7, 0.5)>
N3 <(s1, 0), (0.3, 0.8)> <(s5, 0), (0.6, 0.5)> <(s0, 0), (0.1, 0.5)> <(s4, 0), (0.4, 0.7)>
N4 <(s6, 0), (0.1, 0.5)> <(s2, 0), (0.7, 0.7)> <(s4, 0), (0.5, 0.3)> <(s1, 0), (0.6, 0.6)>
N5 <(s2, 0), (0.3, 0.8)> <(s4, 0), (0.7, 0.6)> <(s1, 0), (0.4, 0.8)> <(s2, 0), (0.6, 0.3)>