Table 2.
Interactive associations of states’ male binge drinking rates and contraceptive access with any second-hand harm from others’ drinking 1.
| Predictor Variables | Full Sample | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|---|
| (N = 7792) | (n = 3156) | (n = 4636) | |
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Male | 0.93 (0.80, 1.08) | - | - |
| Unmarried | 1.36 (1.06, 1.74) * | 1.71 (1.26, 2.31) *** | 1.13 (0.87, 1.48) |
| Race/Ethnicity 2 | |||
| Black | 1.06 (0.85, 1.31) | 1.06 (0.70, 1.59) | 1.03 (0.78, 1.37) |
| Hispanic | 0.87 (0.71, 1.05) | 0.96 (0.62, 1.49) | 0.74 (0.53, 1.03) † |
| Other/Missing | 1.40 (0.99, 2.00) † | 1.69 (1.06, 2.69) * | 1.21 (0.71, 2.07) |
| Less than College Degree | 1.08 (0.86, 1.36) | 1.20 (0.84, 1.69) | 1.02 (0.74, 1.39) |
| Income 3 | |||
| Up to $20,000 | 1.75 (1.26, 2.43) ** | 1.42 (0.90, 2.26) | 2.05 (1.37, 3.08) *** |
| $20,000–$60,000 | 1.41 (1.04, 1.93) * | 1.28 (0.76, 2.15) | 1.55 (1.06, 2.27) * |
| $60,001–$100,000 | 1.11 (0.81, 1.52) | 1.21 (0.75, 1.94) | 0.96 (0.62, 1.48) |
| Missing Income | 0.99 (0.74, 1.33) | 1.09 (0.62, 1.95) | 0.90 (0.57, 1.41) |
| Age | 0.98 (0.97, 0.98) *** | 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) *** | 0.97 (0.96, 0.98) *** |
| Drinking Status 4 | |||
| Drinker, Does not Exceed Guidelines | 1.14 (0.90, 1.45) | 0.96 (0.64, 1.44) | 1.26 (0.92, 1.74) |
| At-risk Drinker, Exceeds Guidelines | 2.32 (1.89, 2.84) *** | 2.14 (1.51, 3.03) | 2.53 (1.86, 3.44) *** |
| State Median Income | 1.06 (0.17, 6.65) | 0.92 (0.05, 16.82) | 1.97 (0.88, 1.17) |
| State Male Binge Drinking Rate | 1.11 (1.01, 1.23) * | 1.07 (0.93, 1.24) | 1.12 (1.02, 1.22) * |
| State Female Binge Drinking Rate | 1.02 (0.86, 1.22) | 1.00 (0.79, 1.25) | 1.01 (0.88, 1.17) |
| Contraceptive Access 5 | 0.90 (0.65, 1.24) | 0.84 (0.49, 1.43) | 0.99 (0.73, 1.32) |
| Male Binge * Contraceptive Access 6 | 0.92 (0.85, 0.99) * | - | 0.91 (0.85, 0.97) ** |
| Constant | 0.34 (0.12, 0.96) * | 0.23 (0.03, 1.60) | 0.29 (0.12, 0.69) ** |
Note: *** p < 0.001 ** p < 0.01 * p < 0.05 † p < 0.10; 1 Harm from Others’ Drinking = Reported one or more of 8 second-hand harms in the past year; 2 Reference = White; 3 Reference = $100,001+; 4 Reference = Non-drinker; 5 Contraceptive access = The state offered or required insurance coverage of contraception and/or low-income access to family planning, versus neither; 6 Main effects model reported for men because interaction was not significant, p > 0.10.