Table 3.
Interactive associations of male binge drinking rates and contraceptive access with harm from drinking strangers.
| Predictor Variables | Full Sample | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|---|
| (N = 7792) | (n = 3156) | (n = 4636) | |
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Male | 1.37 (1.07, 1.74) * | - | - |
| Unmarried | 1.34 (1.03, 1.75) * | 1.52 (0.96, 2.40) † | 1.31 (0.92, 1.87) |
| Race/Ethnicity 1 | |||
| Black | 1.08 (0.74, 1.57) | 1.19 (0.67, 2.11) | 0.92 (0.57, 1.47) |
| Hispanic | 0.90 (0.66, 1.21) | 0.86 (0.51, 1.46) | 0.82 (0.44, 1.51) |
| Other/Missing | 1.64 (1.11, 2.42) * | 2.49 (1.43, 4.33) ** | 0.97 (0.48, 1.97) |
| Less than College Degree | 0.90 (0.64, 1.26) | 1.21 (0.74, 1.98) | 0.67 (0.43, 1.05) † |
| Income 2 | |||
| Up to $20,000 | 1.34 (0.85, 2.11) | 0.84 (0.43, 1.63) | 1.89 (0.91, 3.96) † |
| $20,000–$60,000 | 1.23 (0.75, 2.04) | 1.21 (0.60, 2.44) | 1.19 (0.65, 2.16) |
| $60,001–$100,000 | 0.97 (0.64, 1.48) | 1.04 (0.53, 2.04) | 0.82 (0.38, 1.77) |
| Missing Income | 1.01 (0.61, 1.67) | 1.08 (0.52, 2.22) | 0.88 (0.36, 2.14) |
| Age | 0.97 (0.97, 0.98) *** | 0.99 (0.97, 1.00) * | 0.96 (0.95, 0.97) *** |
| Drinking Status 3 | |||
| Drinker, Does not Exceed Guidelines | 0.95 (0.70, 1.29) | 0.89 (0.55, 1.43) | 0.92 (0.53, 1.61) |
| At-risk Drinker, Exceeds Guidelines | 1.85 (1.41, 2.44) *** | 1.80 (1.11, 2.93) * | 1.82 (1.06, 3.12) * |
| State Median Income | 1.02 (0.15, 7.11) | 0.48 (0.02, 12.16) | 1.72 (0.74, 1.18) |
| State Male Binge Drinking Rate | 1.17 (1.04, 1.31) * | 1.08 (0.94, 1.25) | 1.13 (0.95, 1.36) |
| State Female Binge Drinking Rate | 1.02 (0.85, 1.22) | 1.02 (0.80, 1.28) | 0.93 (0.74, 1.18) |
| Contraceptive Access 4 | 0.74 (0.48, 1.14) | 0.84 (0.38, 1.87) | 0.68 (0.35, 1.34) |
| Male Binge * Contraceptive Access 5 | 0.89 (0.81, 0.97) * | - | - |
| Constant | 1.73 (0.44, 0.67) * | 0.13 (0.01, 1.32) † | 0.32 (0.06, 1.76) |
Note: *** p < 0.001 ** p < 0.01 * p < 0.05 † p < 0.10; 1 Reference = White; 2 Reference = $100,001+; 3 Reference = Non-drinker; 4 Contraceptive access = The state offered or required insurance coverage of contraception and/or low-income access to family planning, versus neither; 5 Main effects model reported for gender-stratified analyses because interactions were not significant, p > 0.10.