Table 5.
Interactive associations of male binge drinking rates and economic equality with harm from drinking spouse/partner.
| Predictor Variables | Full Sample | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|---|
| (N = 7792) | (n = 3156) | (n = 4636) | |
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Male | 0.42 (0.26, 0.68) *** | - | - |
| Unmarried | 0.87 (0.56, 1.34) | 1.02 (0.38, 2.69) | 0.84 (0.50, 1.42) |
| Race/Ethnicity 1 | |||
| Black | 0.96 (0.52, 1.79) | 1.49 (0.57, 3.88) | 0.80 (0.39, 1.65) |
| Hispanic | 0.78 (0.45, 1.35) | 1.38 (0.44, 4.34) | 0.66 (0.34, 1.30) |
| Other/Missing | 1.71 (0.87, 3.39) | 3.02 (0.90, 10.15) † | 1.40 (0.61, 3.23) |
| Less than College Degree | 1.50 (0.98, 2.31) † | 1.29 (0.52, 3.20) | 1.53 (0.96, 2.44) † |
| Income 2 | |||
| Up to $20,000 | 1.81 (0.94, 3.45) † | 1.90 (0.71, 5.07) | 1.87 (0.76, 4.61) |
| $20,000–$60,000 | 1.20 (0.67, 2.17) | 0.66 (0.20, 2.24) | 1.60 (0.69, 3.68) |
| $60,001–$100,000 | 0.95 (0.49, 1.85) | 0.80 (0.38, 1.69) | 0.98 (0.41, 2.34) |
| Missing Income | 0.58 (0.25, 1.38) | 0.77 (1.17, 3.53) | 0.49 (0.18, 1.31) |
| Age | 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) *** | 1.00 (0.98, 1.01) | 0.97 (0.96, 0.98) *** |
| Drinking Status 3 | |||
| Drinker, Does not Exceed Guidelines | 1.51 (0.88, 2.58) | 1.64 (0.53, 5.06) | 1.39 (0.67, 2.88) |
| At-risk Drinker, Exceeds Guidelines | 2.23 (1.37, 3.65) ** | 2.68 (1.04, 6.88) * | 2.13 (1.06, 4.27) * |
| State Median Income | 2.96 (0.07, 117.38) | 7.06 (0.06, 781.29) | 5.16 (0.05, 540.02) |
| State Male Binge Drinking Rate | 0.90 (0.76, 1.07) | 0.90 (0.71, 1.14) | 0.93 (0.74, 1.16) |
| State Female Binge Drinking Rate | 0.90 (0.67, 1.20) | 1.02 (0.68, 1.50) | 0.85 (0.61, 1.19) |
| Economic Equality | 1.88 (0.97, 3.63) † | 1.39 (0.62, 3.12) | 1.83 (0.70, 4.80) |
| Male Binge * Economic Equality 4 | 1.18 (1.00, 1.39) * | - | 1.25 (1.02, 1.54) * |
| Constant | 0.02 (0.00, 0.12) *** | 0.00 (0.00, 0.03) *** | 0.01 (0.00, 0.16) ** |
Note: *** p < 0.001 ** p < 0.01 * p < 0.05 † p < 0.10; 1 Reference = White; 2 Reference = $100,001+; 3 Reference = Non-drinker; 4 Main effects model reported for men because interaction was not significant, p > 0.10.