Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 28;16(23):4766. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234766

Table 3.

Correlation between different self-reported sedentary time questions a and accelerometer-assessed standardized stationary time.

Varieties Stationary (min/day) Prolonged Stationary b (min/day) SED-GIH Katzmarzyk IPAQ (min) Marshall (min)
SED-GIH 0.48 c 0.44 c - 0.89 e 0.83 e 0.72 d
Katzmarzyk 0.53 d 0.46 c 0.89 e - 0.72 d 0.72 d
IPAQ (min) 0.44 c 0.41 c 0.83 e 0.72 d - 0.70 d
Marshall (min) 0.48 c 0.46 c 0.72 d 0.72 d 0.70 d -

All results in Spearman’s rho, except for SED-GIH vs. Katzmarzyk where gamma correlation was used. All p < 0.001. a SED-GIH and the question used by Katzmarzyk [3] are categorical, with seven and five answer alternatives, respectively. IPAQ is an open-ended question [17]. Marshall is the sum of the domain-specific sitting question on weekdays [18,19]. b Prolonged stationary: time in prolonged stationary time (≥20 min). The associations were interpreted as c moderate (Spearman’s rho 0.3–0.5), d strong (Spearman’s rho 0.5–0.8), or e very strong (Spearman’s rho 0.8–1.0).