Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan;372(1):119–127. doi: 10.1124/jpet.119.261818

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

(A) Dose-effect function for Δ9-THC administered i.m. (0.1–0.3 mg/kg n = 3, 1.0 mg/kg n = 2). (B) Dose-effect function for nabilone administered i.m. (n = 3). (C) Dose-effect function for AM4054 administered i.m. (n = 4). (D) Dose-effect function for JWH-018 administered i.m. (n = 3). (E) Dose-effect function for AM3506 administered i.m. (0.3–3.0 mg/kg n = 3, 5.6 mg/kg n = 1). (F) Dose-effect function for URB597 administered i.m. (n = 3). (G) Dose-effect function for AM4302 administered i.m. (n = 4). Abscissae dose, log scale; ordinate, percent of responses on the rimonabant lever. Symbols left of abscissae break indicate performance during saline (S) and rimonabant (R) control sessions. Points represent averages (±S.E.M.) for the group of subjects.