Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 1;26(6):370–379. doi: 10.3747/co.26.5431

TABLE I.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of 378 patients by discordance status

Variable Oncologist–patient discordance p Value Effect size

Yes No
Patients (n) 90 285

Mean age (years) 64.3±10.4 63.2±11.2 0.38 0.10

Mean ESAS score 26.5±19.5 23.9±17.8 0.26 0.14

Mean evaluation of Tx effectiveness 71.7±24.9 74.3±22.0 0.37 0.11

Mean goals of care 42.7±41.8 52.0±22.8 0.05 0.28

Mean religious faith scorea 14.9±4.8 15.3±4.0 0.46 0.09

Sex [n (%) women] 51 (56.7) 140 (49.1) 0.21 0.06

Ethnicity [n (%) white] 61 (67.8) 218 (76.5) 0.10 0.09

Married [n (%) yes] 44 (48.9) 188 (66.0) 0.004 0.15

ECOG PSb [n (%)]
 0 25 (27.8) 70 (24.6) 0.73 0.06
 1 51 (56.7) 179 (63.0)
 2 11 (12.2) 27 (9.5)
 3 3 (3.3) 8 (2.8)

Cancer type [n (%)]
 Gastrointestinal 43 (47.8) 132 (46.3) 0.97 0.01
 Lung 31 (34.4) 100 (35.1)
 Pancreatic 16 (17.8) 53 (18.6)

Annual household incomec [n (%)]
 ≤$20,000 28 (34.1) 49 (19.4) 0.02 0.16
 $21,000–$49,999 19 (23.2) 83 (32.8)
 ≥$50,000 35 (42.7) 121 (47.8)

Living willb [n (%) yes] 55 (61.1) 185 (65.1) 0.49 0.04

During study period … [n (%) yes]
 Received palliative care 32 (35.6) 117 (41.1) 0.35 0.05
 Died 46 (51.1) 158 (55.4) 0.47 0.04
a

On the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Brief Questionnaire.

b

Percentages in the “No discordance” group are based on 284 patients for whom these data were available.

c

Percentages based on 82 (yes group) and 253 (no group) responses.

ESAS = Edmonton Symptom Assessment System; Tx = treatment; ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.