Table II.

Summary of Psychometric Evaluation for Cognitive-Affective Measures Validated in Youth With Chronic Pain

Measure	Number of author groups	Age (years)	Available psychometrics		Rating
			Reliability	Validity
BAPQ pain-specific scale	6 studies; 3 author groups	11–18	Internal consistency = 0.83 (pain management sample); 0.88 (rheumatology samples) Test–retest reliability (17 days) = 0.77	Convergent validity	Well established
FOPQ-C	5 studies; 2 author groups	8–17	Internal consistency = 0.92 Test–retest reliability (4 weeks) = 0.65–0.74	Construct validity	Well established
				Criterion-related validity
				Exploratory factor analysis
PCS-C	30 studies; 23 author groups	8–16	Internal consistency = 0.90 Test–retest reliability (5 months) = 0.71	Construct validity	Well established
				Exploratory factor analysis Confirmatory factor analysis
PCQ-IC	18 studies; 10 author groups	8–18	Internal consistency = 0.70	Construct validity	Well established
				Exploratory factor analysis Confirmatory factor analysis
PRI—catastrophizing subscale	7 studies; 3 author groups	5–18	Internal consistency = 0.84	Construct validity	Well established
				Confirmatory factor analysis
PPFQ	1 study; 1 author group	12–21	Internal consistency = 0.83–0.89	Construct validity	Promising assessment (only used in one peer-reviewed article)
PHODA-Youth	1 study; 1 author group	13–21	Internal consistency = 0.98 Test–retest reliability (4 weeks) = 0.94	Construct validity	Well establisheda
				Exploratory factor analysis

^aSince the search date of this review, one further author team (Simons et al., 2017) published on the PHODA-Youth in young people with chronic pain, meaning this measure is now well established.

Note. Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire = BAPQ; Fear of Pain Questionnaire for Children = FOPQ-C; Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children = PCS-C; Pain Coping Questionnaire internalizing/catastrophizing = PCQ-IC; Pain Response Inventory = PRI; Pediatric Pain Fear Questionnaire = PPFQ; Photograph Series of Daily Activities = PHODA-Youth.