Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 25;43(3):314–325. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx103

Table III.

Summary of Meta-Analyses on Correlations Between Cognitive-Affective Measures and Relevant Pain and Emotional Distress Variables

Outcome N studies N participants Effect size 95% confidence intervals I2 (%)
PCS-C
 Pain intensitya 11 3,212 0.32 0.28–0.36 14.99
 Pain-related disabilityb 12 2,797 0.42 0.38–0.46 23.55
 Depression 6 1,422 0.53 0.43–0.63 74.91
 General anxiety 5 2,112 0.51 0.45–0.57 49.05
FOPQ-C fear of pain subscale
 Pain intensity 3 701 0.19 0.11–0.27 16.70
 Pain-related disability 5 1,303 0.45 0.36–0.55 73.55
PCQ-IC
 Pain intensity 5 609 0.22 0.12–0.32 30.33
 Pain-related disability 6 717 0.32 0.20–0.44 61.81
 Depression 4 414 0.48 0.39–0.57 14.69
BAPQ pain-specific anxiety
 Pain-related disability 3 1,185 0.46 0.37–0.56 53.64

Note. Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire = BAPQ; Fear of Pain Questionnaire for Children = FOPQ-C; Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children = PCS-C; Pain Coping Questionnaire internalizing/catastrophizing scale = PCQ-IC.

Small effect size = 0.2; moderate effect size = 0.5; large effect size = 0.8.

I2: 0–40% might not be important; 30–60% moderate heterogeneity; 50–90% substantial heterogeneity; 75–100% considerable heterogeneity.

a

Trim and fill meta-analysis with one filled study: 0.41 (95% CI 0.37–0.45).

b

Trim and fill meta-analysis with one filled study: 0.42 (95% CI 0.33–0.52).