Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 17;10:1595. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01595

Table 5.

Summary of the model that best fit specific leaf area data, which included: treatment, selfing, and species, and also all the interactions between them.

Variable Parameter estimated t value P
Intercept 188.4 11.5 <2e‑16***
Selfing 79.6 2.98 0.003**
Wet treatment 22.43 1.14 0.25
S.H. 110.29 3.98 9.7e‑05***
Selfing: wet treat –82.8 –2.56 0.01*
Selfing: S.H. –329.6 –4.24 3.56e‑05***
Wet Treat: S.H. –97.08 –2.95 0.003**
Selfing: wet treat: S.H. 204.8 2.2 0.03*

S.H., S. hookeri. Estimated parameters with their associated P values are shown for all variables in the model (selfing, treatment, and species, no interaction was included). A mixed model with a nested random intercept for each mother was generated (see is Statistical Analysis section). Significance levels: P > 0.05 (ns = not significant); P < 0.05 = *; P< 0.01 = **; P < 0.001 = ***.