Table 5.
Summary of the model that best fit specific leaf area data, which included: treatment, selfing, and species, and also all the interactions between them.
| Variable | Parameter estimated | t value | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 188.4 | 11.5 | <2e‑16*** |
| Selfing | 79.6 | 2.98 | 0.003** |
| Wet treatment | 22.43 | 1.14 | 0.25 |
| S.H. | 110.29 | 3.98 | 9.7e‑05*** |
| Selfing: wet treat | –82.8 | –2.56 | 0.01* |
| Selfing: S.H. | –329.6 | –4.24 | 3.56e‑05*** |
| Wet Treat: S.H. | –97.08 | –2.95 | 0.003** |
| Selfing: wet treat: S.H. | 204.8 | 2.2 | 0.03* |
S.H., S. hookeri. Estimated parameters with their associated P values are shown for all variables in the model (selfing, treatment, and species, no interaction was included). A mixed model with a nested random intercept for each mother was generated (see is Statistical Analysis section). Significance levels: P > 0.05 (ns = not significant); P < 0.05 = *; P< 0.01 = **; P < 0.001 = ***.