Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Frontiers in Physiology logoLink to Frontiers in Physiology
. 2019 Dec 17;10:1514. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01514

Interleukin-5 in the Pathophysiology of Severe Asthma

Corrado Pelaia 1, Giovanni Paoletti 2,3, Francesca Puggioni 2,3, Francesca Racca 2,3, Girolamo Pelaia 1, Giorgio Walter Canonica 2,3, Enrico Heffler 2,3,*
PMCID: PMC6927944  PMID: 31920718

Abstract

Interleukin-5 (IL-5) exerts a central pathogenic role in differentiation, recruitment, survival, and degranulation of eosinophils. Indeed, during the last years, significant advances have been made in our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the powerful actions of IL-5 finalized to the induction, maintenance, and amplification of eosinophilic inflammation. Therefore, IL-5 is a suitable target for add-on biological therapies based on either IL-5 inhibition (mepolizumab, reslizumab) or blockade of its receptor (benralizumab). These modern treatments can result in being definitely beneficial for patients with severe type 2 (T2)-high eosinophilic asthma, refractory to conventional anti-inflammatory drugs such as inhaled and even systemic corticosteroids.

Keywords: IL-5, eosinophils, T2-high asthma, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab

Introduction

Asthma is a chronic and heterogeneous airway disorder, characterized by recurrent respiratory symptoms including wheezing, cough, and chest tightness, which are caused by usually reversible airflow limitation due to bronchial inflammation and remodeling (Holgate et al., 2015; Pelaia et al., 2015). In particular, many patients with severe asthma express a type 2 (T2)-high phenotype featured by eosinophilic inflammation (Bousquet et al., 1990; Schleich et al., 2014). Indeed, airway eosinophilic infiltration is quite frequent in both allergic and non-allergic asthma, and can also occur in severe and fatal disease (Huber and Koessler, 1922; Houston et al., 1953; Varricchi et al., 2016; Haldar, 2017). T2-high asthma is characterized by accumulation of eosinophils within the airways, where these cells produce and release cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, cytotoxic proteins, and lipid mediators, which together play a relevant role in the pathobiology of bronchial inflammation and remodeling (Bochner and Gleich, 2010). Detection of high eosinophil counts in both peripheral blood and induced sputum is a common feature of T2-high asthma. In this regard, it is noteworthy that airway eosinophilia can occur in more than half asthmatic subjects, and high eosinophil levels are associated with recurrent asthma exacerbations and severe bronchial obstruction (Bousquet et al., 1990).

The most important biological factor responsible for eosinophil differentiation, growth, activation, survival, and recruitment to airways is interleukin-5 (IL-5) (Stirling et al., 2001; Fulkerson and Rothenberg, 2013; Varricchi and Canonica, 2016). Therefore, this cytokine exerts key functions in the pathogenesis of eosinophilic asthma, which is often therapeutically responsive to corticosteroids because of its effective ability to induce eosinophil apoptosis (Zhang et al., 2000). However, severe eosinophilic asthma may be resistant to both inhaled and systemic corticosteroids, also because of an excessive bronchial amount of IL-5, which can thereby overcome the pro-apoptotic effects of these drugs on eosinophils (Dunican and Fahy, 2017). Hence, patients with severe T2-high eosinophilic asthma, refractory to corticosteroids, may experience an inadequate control of respiratory symptoms and frequent disease exacerbations, thus being characterized by relevant unmet needs. Moreover, in these subjects, IL-5-dependent eosinophilia can also contribute to the development of clinically significant comorbidities such as chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Indeed, these upper airway disorders originate from cellular and molecular mechanisms, which appear to be very similar to those underlying type 2 inflammation in asthma (Heffler et al., 2018, 2019; Ahern and Cervin, 2019).

For all such reasons, in severe T2-high asthma, IL-5 represents a pivotal pathogenic factor and a highly valuable target for add-on biological therapies of corticosteroid-resistant, difficult-to-treat eosinophilic phenotypes (Varricchi and Canonica, 2016; Brussino et al., 2018). In particular, several monoclonal antibodies have been developed against either IL-5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab) or its receptor (benralizumab), thereby making it possible to break down the main pathobiological pathway implicated in eosinophilic asthma (Egan et al., 1999; Gnanakumaran and Babu, 2003; Kolbeck et al., 2010; Pelaia et al., 2016; Bagnasco et al., 2017; Pelaia et al., 2017; Varricchi et al., 2017a,b; Bagnasco et al., 2018a,b; Pelaia et al., 2018a,b,c, 2019).

Taking together the above considerations, it is very clear that IL-5 plays a central role as the most important pathogenic mediator responsible for eosinophilic asthma, as well as a crucial therapeutic target for anti-asthma biological treatments. Therefore, the aim of the present review article is to discuss the pathobiological interactions between IL-5 and T2-high eosinophilic asthma, the mechanism of action of IL-5, and the relevance of both this cytokine and its receptor as targets of selective anti-eosinophil monoclonal antibodies.

IL-5 and Eosinophilic Asthma

The main cellular sources of IL-5 include T helper-2 (Th2) lymphocytes and group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) (Figure 1; Woodruff et al., 2009; Brusselle et al., 2013; Walker et al., 2013; Smith et al., 2016; Yanagibashi et al., 2017). Th2 cells produce and secrete IL-5 upon a complex activation process triggered by inhaled allergens and driven by dendritic cells (Lambrecht et al., 2019). In this regard, the presence of interleukin-4 (IL-4) is essential, because of its requirement for Th2 cell commitment and activation via stimulation of key transcription factors such as STAT6 and GATA3 (Lambrecht and Hammad, 2015). IL-5 release from ILC2 is dependent on GATA3 activation induced by epithelial innate cytokines including IL-25, IL-33, and especially thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) (Figure 1; Lambrecht and Hammad, 2015). In addition to ILC2 and Th2 cells, other cellular sources of IL-5 include invariant natural killer (NK) T cells, mast cells, and eosinophils themselves (Figure 1; Shakoory et al., 2004; Sakuishi et al., 2007; Hogan et al., 2008). In particular, by releasing IL-5 activated mast cells implement a bidirectional cross-talk with eosinophils (Galdiero et al., 2017). Such functional interactions between mast cells and eosinophils, also supported by physical contacts involving these two cell types, harbor the so-called “allergic effector unit” (Minai-Fleminger et al., 2010; Galdiero et al., 2017).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Biological actions exerted by IL-5 on eosinophils. IL-5 is produced by several cellular elements, including Th2 lymphocytes, group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2), mast cells, and eosinophils. These cells release IL-5 upon activation triggered by multiple environmental stimuli such as inhaled allergens, respiratory viruses, and airborne pollutants. IL-5 exerts pleiotropic effects on eosinophils, thereby promoting their maturation, activation, survival, migration from bloodstream, and recruitment to airways.

IL-5 is a powerful pro-inflammatory cytokine that is responsible for maturation, proliferation, activation, and migration of eosinophils (Figure 1). The close pathogenic link between IL-5 and eosinophilic inflammation has been clearly demonstrated using both animal and human experimental models of asthma (Greenfeder et al., 2001). In particular, IL-5 is responsible for airway eosinophilia and bronchial hyperresponsiveness induced by allergen challenge in sensitized guinea pigs (Mauser et al., 1993). Moreover, in the lungs of these animals, an eosinophilic inflammatory response can be experimentally evoked by recombinant human IL-5 (Lilly et al., 1996). Similar to guinea pigs, upon allergen challenge, an IL-5-dependent influx of eosinophils was also detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung tissue of sensitized mice (Kung et al., 1994, 1995). Such results have been further corroborated by demonstrating that bronchial eosinophilia and airway hyperresponsiveness, induced by multiple allergen challenges, were abrogated in sensitized IL-5-deficient mice (Foster et al., 1996; Kopf et al., 1996). In experimental monkey models of asthma, IL-5 was capable of inducing bronchial eosinophilia and the consequent airway hyperresponsiveness (Mauser et al., 1995). Furthermore, it has been shown in both rabbits and humans that delivery of recombinant IL-5 to airway smooth muscle enhanced the contractile response to acetylcholine (Hakonarson et al., 1999), and this effect was probably mediated by the release of eosinophil granule proteins (Elbon et al., 1995). In atopic patients experiencing both early and late asthmatic reactions, the bone marrow responds to antigen challenge by enhancing the production of eosinophils, which resulted in being associated with an increase in IL-5 mRNA levels (Wood et al., 2002). In addition, IL-5 prolonged eosinophil survival in allergen-challenged atopic asthmatics (Ohnishi et al., 1993).

In allergic asthmatic subjects, the eosinophilopoietic actions of IL-5 take place in both bone marrow and bronchial mucosa (“in situ eosinophilopoiesis”), where this cytokine promotes eosinophil differentiation and maturation from CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (Wood et al., 2002; Dorman et al., 2004; Bhalla et al., 2018). In fact, elevated IL-5 levels and high cell counts of eosinophil progenitors and mature eosinophils can be found in induced sputum from patients with allergic asthma (Dorman et al., 2004). Furthermore, in comparison to both healthy controls and subjects with mild asthma, higher serum IL-5 concentrations were detected in patients with severe disease (Greenfeder et al., 2001). IL-5 synergizes with eotaxins, thus contributing to recruit eosinophils to asthmatic airways (Fulkerson and Rothenberg, 2013). Indeed, high levels of IL-5 and eotaxins were found in induced sputum from patients experiencing acute asthma exacerbations (Park et al., 2003). A synergic action is also exerted by IL-5 in conjunction with IL-18 (Kandikattu et al., 2019). In particular, concomitant increases of serum levels of IL-5 and IL-18 were found in patients with asthma, and the concentrations of these two cytokines correlated with disease exacerbations (Kandikattu et al., 2019). IL-5 and IL-18 strongly cooperate to induce eosinophil development and functional activation. IL-5 also inhibits eosinophil apoptosis, and sputum IL-5 levels were reported to be negatively correlated with apoptotic eosinophils in subjects with either asthma exacerbations or stable disease (Xu et al., 2007; Ilmarinen et al., 2014). Moreover, in T2-high asthma IL-5 induces eosinophil adhesion to and migration in the extracellular matrix by favoring the interaction of eosinophils with periostin, a matricellular protein whose enhanced expression is associated with eosinophil trafficking toward bronchi (Johansson, 2017). IL-5 is also involved in the pathobiology of late-onset, non-allergic eosinophilic asthma (Brusselle et al., 2013). In this case, ILC2 and not Th2 lymphocytes are mainly responsible for IL-5 production (Walker et al., 2013). Differently from blood and airway pro-inflammatory eosinophils, the lung resident subsets of homeostatic anti-inflammatory and anti-allergic eosinophils seem to be partially independent from IL-5, at least in mice (Marichal et al., 2017).

With regard to the pathobiology of asthma, in addition to promoting the development and amplification of eosinophilic inflammation, IL-5 is also implicated in the induction of airway remodeling (Kay et al., 2004). Indeed, in murine models of asthma, it has been shown that IL-5 gene deletion was associated with a parallel suppression of both lung eosinophilia and bronchial remodeling (Cho et al., 2004). On the other hand, IL-5 transgenic mice were reported to be characterized by an enhanced airway fibrotic response to repeated allergen challenges (Tanaka et al., 2004). The results of these animal studies have been further corroborated by examining the bronchial biopsies taken from asthmatic patients treated with an anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody (Flood-Page et al., 2003). In particular, it was demonstrated through confocal microscopy that anti-IL-5 treatment decreased the thickness of reticular basement membrane by reducing the deposition of extracellular matrix proteins such as procollagen III, tenascin, and lumican (Flood-Page et al., 2003).

IL-5: Mechanism of Action

The biological effects of IL-5 are mediated by its selective interaction with the IL-5 receptor (IL-5R), consisting of a specific α subunit (IL-5Rα) and a non-specific βc heterodimer, which can be recognized also by interleukin-3 (IL-3) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Figure 2; Rossjohn et al., 2000; Murphy and Young, 2006). IL-5 binds as a homodimeric protein to IL-5Rα, which is highly expressed on eosinophil surface (Varricchi et al., 2016), thus recruiting the βc dimer and inducing the assembly of the IL-5/IL-5Rα/βc ternary complex (Broughton et al., 2012). When IL-5 is absent, IL-5Rα is complexed with the intracellular tyrosine kinase Janus kinase (JAK)2, whereas the βc subunit is associated with JAK1 (Kouro and Takatsu, 2009). When IL-5 is present, it binds to IL-5Rα and drives the constitution of a functional IL-5Rα/βc receptor complex, which is responsible for the activation of an intricate network of signaling pathways (Figure 2; Johanson et al., 1995; Ishino et al., 2008; Molfino et al., 2012). In particular, binding of IL-5 to IL-5Rα sequentially activates JAK2 and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT)1, 3, and 5, which in turn stimulate the transcriptional functions of many genes involved in eosinophil proliferation, including pim-1 and cyclin D3 (Pazdrak et al., 1995; Stout et al., 2004). Moreover, JAK2 is engaged in active cooperation with Lyn and Raf-1 kinases, and such functional interactions lead to inhibition of eosinophil apoptosis (Pazdrak et al., 1998); the inhibitory effect of IL-5 on eosinophil apoptosis is also mediated by NF-κB-dependent induction of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xL (Schwartz et al., 2015; Amruta and Kandikattu, 2018). Raf-1 also stimulates eosinophil degranulation (Pazdrak et al., 1998).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Molecular mechanisms of action underlying the effects of IL-5 on eosinophils. IL-5 binds to the α subunit of IL-5 receptor (IL-5Rα), thereby inducing its interaction with βc subunits and the following activation of a complex intracellular signaling network, consisting of JAK1/2-STAT1/3/5 modules, p38 and ERK MAP kinases, and NF-κB transcription factor. The consequent stimulation of specific target genes leads to eosinophil maturation, survival, and activation.

Other signal transduction modules activated by IL-5 include further intracellular kinases such as phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) (Figure 2). In particular, via activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK)1/2 and protein kinase C (PKC), PI3K mediates IL-5-induced interaction of eosinophils with intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) (Sano et al., 2005). Ras-Raf-1-mediated activation of the ERK subfamily of MAPK drives c-fos gene transcription, which is involved in several eosinophil functions including cell maturation, survival, and proliferation, as well as stimulation of the production of the powerful eosinophil chemoattractant leukotriene C4 (Adachi and Alam, 1998; Bates et al., 2000; Pelaia et al., 2005; Takatsu and Nakajima, 2008; Thompson-Souza et al., 2017). Furthermore, through a NF-κB-dependent mechanism, p38 MAPK up-regulates eosinophil biosynthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and also stimulates eosinophil recruitment within the context of allergic inflammatory responses (Adachi et al., 2000; Ip et al., 2005; Pelaia et al., 2005).

Therefore, because of the pivotal role played by IL-5 in the pathophysiology of T2-high asthma, this cytokine and its receptor represent key molecular targets for current biological therapies aimed to improve the control of severe and difficult-to-treat eosinophilic disease (Varricchi et al., 2016; Bagnasco et al., 2018a,b; McGregor et al., 2019; Siddiqui et al., 2019).

IL-5 and Its Receptor: Molecular Targets for Biological Therapies of Severe Asthma

In clinical practice, three monoclonal antibodies, namely mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab, are currently available, which make it possible to effectively interfere with the pathogenic IL-5/IL-5R pro-eosinophilic axis. While mepolizumab and reslizumab are selective IL-5 inhibitors, benralizumab is an IL-5 receptor antagonist (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Mechanisms of action of biological drugs targeting IL-5 or its receptor. Mepolizumab and reslizumab interact with IL-5, thus inhibiting its biological effects on eosinophils. Benralizumab blocks via its Fab fragments IL-5Rα, thereby neutralizing IL-5 bioactivity. Moreover, through its Fc constant region benralizumab binds to the FcγIIIRa receptor expressed by natural killer cells, enabling them to induce eosinophil apoptosis.

Mepolizumab (SB-240563) is a humanized IgG1/k monoclonal antibody that specifically binds with high affinity to IL-5, thereby impeding its linkage to IL-5Rα (Figure 3; Gnanakumaran and Babu, 2003; Walsh, 2015; Fainardi et al., 2016; Varricchi et al., 2017a). In particular, mepolizumab was developed by incorporating specific murine antibody fragments targeting human IL-5 into a human IgG1 heavy chain (Hart et al., 2001). The relevant benefits induced by mepolizumab in patients with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma have been clearly documented by many randomized controlled trials (RCT) (Pelaia et al., 2017; Varricchi et al., 2017a). Initially, the efficacy of mepolizumab was demonstrated by Nair et al. and Haldar et al. in a few patients with severe eosinophilic asthma experiencing frequent disease exacerbations (Haldar et al., 2009; Nair et al., 2009), These two seminal studies were the first ones to show that mepolizumab was able to significantly decrease asthma exacerbations, and this effect was concomitant with a sharp reduction of both sputum and blood eosinophils (Haldar et al., 2009; Nair et al., 2009). In addition to such results, using chest CT (computed tomography) scan, Haldar et al. also documented that mepolizumab decreased both thickness and total area of bronchial walls (Haldar et al., 2009). These observations corroborated previous findings published by Flood-Page et al., who reported that mepolizumab was capable of reducing the amount of extracellular matrix proteins deposited within the sub-epithelial reticular basement membrane of airway mucosa; this effect was associated with decreased BALF concentrations of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) (Flood-Page et al., 2003). Therefore, it can be inferred that the potential anti-remodeling effect of mepolizumab was probably a consequence of the depleting action exerted on eosinophils, which are important cellular sources of TGF-β1, a prominent growth factor involved in the pathobiology of the airway structural changes occurring in asthma (Makinde et al., 2007).

Later, Pavord et al. performed the phase 2b/3 DREAM (Dose Ranging Efficacy And safety with Mepolizumab in severe asthma) trial, thus confirming, in a much larger study population, that mepolizumab lowered sputum and blood eosinophil levels, and also significantly decreased the asthma exacerbation rate (Pavord et al., 2012). Subsequently, two further studies named MENSA (MEpolizumab as adjunctive therapy iN patients with Severe Asthma) and SIRIUS (SteroId ReductIon with mepolizUmab Study) were conducted by Ortega et al. and Bel et al., respectively. Both trials demonstrated that, in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, mepolizumab decreased the number of asthma exacerbations, improved symptom control and quality of life, and also induced a slight FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s) increase (Bel et al., 2014; Ortega et al., 2014), Moreover, the SIRIUS trial provided convincing evidence about the oral corticosteroid-sparing action of mepolizumab, consisting of a 50% decrease in prednisone intake (Bel et al., 2014). More recently, the phase IIIb MUSCA study, performed by Chupp et al., confirmed the ability of mepolizumab to improve health-related quality of life (Chupp et al., 2017). All these studies also showed that mepolizumab is characterized by a very good safety and tolerability profile. The main RCT referring to mepolizumab have been summarized in Table 1. In addition to RCT, mepolizumab is also undergoing evaluation within the context of real-life studies carried out in daily clinical practice. In this regard, preliminary data suggest that in a real-world setting mepolizumab can result in being even more effective than in RCT, and such findings might depend on the higher blood eosinophil counts characterizing real-life patients when compared to asthmatics enrolled in RCT (Pelaia et al., 2018a; Bagnasco et al., 2018b).

Table 1.

Mepolizumab: main randomized clinical trials.

Authors Inclusion criteria N Main results
Flood-Page et al. (2003) Mild atopic asthmatics 11 ↓ Blood and BALF eosinophils
= FEV1, = PEF, = airway hyperresponsiveness
Haldar et al. (2009) Eosinophilic asthma 61 ↓ Blood and sputum eosinophils
= FEV1, = FeNO, = airway hyperresponsiveness
↓ Exacerbations
↑ QoL
Nair et al. (2009) Prednisone-dependent eosinophilic asthma 9 ↓ Blood and sputum eosinophils
↓ Exacerbations
Pavord et al. (2012) Severe eosinophilic asthma 462 ↓ Blood and sputum eosinophils
= FEV1, = FeNO, = AQLQ, = ACQ
↓ Exacerbations
Ortega et al. (2014) Severe eosinophilic asthma 385 ↑ FEV1
↓ Exacerbations, ↓ Hospitalizations
ACQ-5 and SGRQ improvement
Bel et al. (2014) Severe eosinophilic asthma 135 ↓ Blood and sputum eosinophils
↓ Exacerbations, ↓ OCS intake
ACQ-5 improvement
Chupp et al. (2017) Severe eosinophilic asthma 274 ↑ FEV1, ↑ FEF25–75
ACQ-5 and SGRQ improvement
Open in a new tab

BALF, Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; FEV1, Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; PEF, Peak expiratory flow; FeNO, Exhaled fraction of nitric oxide; QoL, Health-related quality of life; AQLQ, Asthma quality of life questionnaire; ACQ, Asthma control questionnaire; SGRQ, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; OCS, Oral corticosteroids; FEF25–75, Forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of forced vital capacity.

Reslizumab (SCH55700) is a humanized IgG4/κ monoclonal antibody which includes in its structure the complementarity-determining regions of the rat monoclonal IgG2a antibody JES1-39D10, that specifically interact with the epitope encompassing amino acids 89–92 of human IL-5, thereby preventing its binding to IL-5Rα (Figure 3; Zhang et al., 1999). In regard to add-on biological therapy of severe eosinophilic asthma, the efficacy and safety of reslizumab have been evaluated in several RCT (Pelaia et al., 2016; Varricchi et al., 2017b). The first phase 2 study was performed by Kips et al., who showed that reslizumab lowered blood and sputum eosinophil counts, and also induced a transient FEV1 increase (Kips et al., 2003). A subsequent, larger phase 2 trial, carried out by Castro et al., demonstrated that reslizumab significantly increased FEV1, and also elicited a non-significant trend toward a better asthma control, especially in highly eosinophilic patients with concomitant nasal polyposis (Castro et al., 2011), Later, two phase 3 studies were conducted by Castro et al., who demonstrated the effectiveness of reslizumab in decreasing by 50–59% the annual rate of asthma exacerbations in severe asthmatics with blood eosinophil counts >400 cells/ml (Castro et al., 2015); reslizumab also improved asthma symptom control and enhanced FEV1 (Castro et al., 2015). The beneficial effects of reslizumab on lung function were further confirmed by another phase 3 trial carried out by Bjermer et al., who reported that reslizumab not only increased FEV1, but also improved airflow limitation at level of peripheral airways, as shown by significant increases in FEF25–75 (forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of forced vital capacity) (Bjermer et al., 2016). More recently, an additional phase 3 trial performed by Brusselle et al. highlighted that reslizumab was able to reduce asthma exacerbations and improve lung function, especially in patients with eosinophilic late-onset asthma (Brusselle et al., 2017). Taken together, the results of the above studies evidenced a good safety and tolerability profile of reslizumab. The main RCT referring to reslizumab have been summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Reslizumab: main randomized clinical trials.

Authors Inclusion criteria N Main results
Kips et al. (2003) Severe asthmatics 18 ↓ Blood and sputum eosinophils
Transient FEV1 increase
Castro et al. (2011) Poorly controlled eosinophilic asthma 61 ↓ Blood and sputum eosinophils
↑ FEV1, ↑ FVC
ACQ-5 improvement
Castro et al. (2015) Severe eosinophilic asthma 953 ↓ Blood eosinophils
↑ FEV1
↓ Exacerbations
AQLQ, ACQ-7, ASUI improvement
Bjermer et al. (2016) Severe eosinophilic asthma 315 ↓ Blood eosinophils
↑ FEV1, ↑ FEF25–75
ACQ-5, ACQ-6, AQLQ, ASUI improvement
Brusselle et al. (2017) Severe eosinophilic asthma 477 ↓ Exacerbations
↑ FEV1
Open in a new tab

FEV1, Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity; PEF, Peak expiratory flow; ACQ, Asthma control questionnaire; AQLQ, Asthma quality of life questionnaire; ASUI, Asthma symptom utility index; FEF25–75, forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of forced vital capacity.

Benralizumab (MEDI-563) is a humanized afucosylated IgG1/κ monoclonal antibody, developed via hybridoma technology, whose Fab fragments contain murine amino acid sequences which selectively recognize the isoleucine-61 residue of the domain 1 of human IL-5Rα, located near IL-5 binding site (Ishino et al., 2004; Koike et al., 2009; Kolbeck et al., 2010). As a consequence, the interaction of benralizumab with its recognition site on IL-5Rα impedes IL-5 binding to target cells (Figure 3), thus preventing hetero-dimerization of IL-5Rα and βc subunits, as well as the subsequent activation of IL-5-dependent signaling pathways. Furthermore, through the constant Fc region benralizumab binds to the FcγRIIIa membrane receptor expressed by natural killer cells (Figure 3), which upon FcγRIIIa activation release the pro-apoptotic proteins granzyme B and perforin, responsible for eosinophil apoptosis implemented via antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), a mechanism which is markedly amplified by afucosylation (Shields et al., 2002; Ghazi et al., 2012).

Several phase 3 RCT have recently shown that, as add-on treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma, benralizumab is characterized by an excellent pattern of efficacy, safety, and tolerability (Pelaia et al., 2018b,c; Gonzalez et al., 2019). In particular, CALIMA and SIROCCO trials showed that benralizumab significantly decreased the annual rate of severe eosinophilic exacerbations of asthma, and also improved asthma symptom control and enhanced FEV1 (Bleecker et al., 2016; FitzGerald et al., 2016). Benralizumab-induced improvement in lung function was also confirmed by BISE study (Ferguson et al., 2017). In addition, the ZONDA study demonstrated that benralizumab was able to significantly lower the daily intake of oral corticosteroids (Nair et al., 2017). Moreover, the BORA trial showed that a long-term use of benralizumab was associated with a very good safety and tolerability profile (Busse et al., 2019). Furthermore, it is noteworthy that benralizumab appears to be very effective in both allergic and non-allergic severe asthma (Chipps et al., 2018). The main RCT referring to benralizumab have been summarized in Table 3. The latter findings have also been recently confirmed by preliminary real-life observations, which suggest that in daily clinical practice the therapeutic actions of benralizumab may result in being even more rapid and effective with respect to RCT (Pelaia et al., 2019).

Table 3.

Benralizumab: main randomized clinical trials.

Authors Inclusion criteria N Main results
Bleecker et al. (2016) Severe asthma 797 ↑ FEV1
↓ Exacerbations
ACQ-6 and AQLQ improvement
FitzGerald et al. (2016) Severe eosinophilic asthma 866 ↑ FEV1
↓ Exacerbations
ACQ-6 and AQLQ improvement
Ferguson et al. (2017) Severe eosinophilic asthma 106 ↓ Blood eosinophils
↑ FEV1
= ACQ-6, = AQLQ
Nair et al. (2017) Severe eosinophilic asthma 145 ↓ Exacerbations
↓ OCS intake
Busse et al. (2019) Severe eosinophilic asthma 1,576 Long-term safety and tolerability
Open in a new tab

FEV1, Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; ACQ, Asthma control questionnaire; AQLQ, Asthma quality of life questionnaire; OCS, Oral corticosteroids.

In regard to IL-5 receptor blockade finalized to the treatment of eosinophilic asthma, a potential alternative approach to the use of monoclonal antibodies can be represented by the development of small molecule antagonists (Uings and McKinnon, 2002). Within such a context, an isothiazolone compound was identified, which appeared to be able to selectively interfere with IL-5/IL-5R interaction (Devos et al., 1994; Uings and McKinnon, 2002). However, to our knowledge this small molecule IL-5R antagonist has not yet reached the stage of clinical investigation.

Concluding Remarks

Our very strong awareness of the pivotal pathobiological role played by IL-5 in T2-high eosinophilic asthma makes it critical to carefully characterize asthmatic patients on the basis of their inflammatory substrate, as well as in consideration of the clinical and functional responses to standard treatments. Indeed, the most relevant unmet needs are experienced by both allergic and non-allergic asthmatics who are not well controlled by corticosteroids, also because of the prominent pro-eosinophilic action of IL-5, which probably overwhelms the potential efficacy of conventional anti-inflammatory drugs. Therefore, under such circumstances, IL-5 and its receptor may represent valuable therapeutic targets. In this regard, several RCT and some preliminary real-life studies have clearly shown that mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab are safe and effective as add-on biological therapies for patients with difficult-to-treat eosinophilic asthma. Indeed, such biologics are currently included within the step 5 of GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) guidelines (Figure 4; Global Initiative for Asthma, 2019). Therefore, the only limitation of these monoclonal antibodies depends on their high cost (Anderson and Szefler, 2019). Although the use of anti-eosinophilic biological treatments for severe asthma can significantly decrease the intake of oral corticosteroids, the number of emergency visits and hospitalizations, as well as the loss of work- and school-days, and their cost-effectiveness should be improved by price reductions eventually provided by manufacturers (Anderson and Szefler, 2019). Hopefully, lower costs of mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab could make these drugs more affordable by health care systems of economically weak countries.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Stepwise therapy of asthma. Current asthma treatment is based on a stepwise approach, consisting of progressive therapeutic increases until disease control is achieved.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adachi T., Alam R. (1998). The mechanism of IL-5 signal transduction. Am. J. Phys. 275, C623–C633. 10.1152/ajpcell.1998.275.3.C623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adachi T., Choudhuri B. K., Stafford S., Sur S., Alam R. (2000). The differential role of extracellular signal-regulated kinases and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in eosinophil functions. J. Immunol. 165, 2198–2204. 10.4049/jimmunol.165.4.2198, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahern S., Cervin A. (2019). Inflammation and endotyping in chronic rhinosinusitis—a paradigm shift. Medicina 55:E95. 10.3390/medicina55040095, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amruta N., Kandikattu H. K. (2018). Apoptosis of inflammatory cells in asthma. Int. J. Cell Biol. Physiol. 1, 1–6. 10.5281/zenodo.2530304 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson W. C., III., Szefler S. J. (2019). Cost-effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of biologic therapy for asthma. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 122, 367–372. 10.1016/j.anai.2019.01.018, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bagnasco D., Caminati M., Ferrando M., Aloè T., Testino E., Canonica G. W., et al. (2018a). Anti-IL-5 and IL-5Rα: efficacy and safety of new therapeutic strategies in severe uncontrolled asthma. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018:5698212. 10.1155/2018/5698212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bagnasco D., Ferrando M., Varricchi G., Puggioni F., Passalacqua G., Canonica G. W., et al. (2017). Anti-interleukin 5 (IL-5) and IL-5Rα biological drugs: efficacy, safety, and future perspectives in severe eosinophilic asthma. Front. Med. 4:135. 10.3389/fmed.2017.00135, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bagnasco D., Milanese M., Rolla G., Lombardi C., Bucca C., Heffler E., et al. (2018b). The North-Western Italian experience with anti IL-5 therapy and comparison with regulatory trials. World Allergy Organ. J. 11:34. 10.1186/s40413-018-0210-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bates M. E., Green V. L., Bertics P. J. (2000). ERK1 and ERK2 activation by chemotactic factors in human eosinophils is interleukin 5-dependent and contributes to leukotriene C4 biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 10968–10975. 10.1074/jbc.275.15.10968, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bel E. H., Wenzel S. E., Thompson P. J., Prazma C. M., Keene O. N., Yancey S. W., et al. (2014). Oral glucocorticoid-sparing effect of mepolizumab in eosinophilic asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 1189–1197. 10.1056/NEJMoa1403291, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bhalla A., Mukherjee M., Nair P. (2018). Airway eosinophilopoietic and autoimmune mechanisms of eosinophilia in severe asthma. Immunol. Allergy Clin. N. Am. 38, 639–654. 10.1016/j.iac.2018.06.003, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bjermer L., Lemiere C., Maspero J., Weiss S., Zangrilli J., Germinaro M. (2016). Reslizumab for inadequately controlled asthma with elevated blood eosinophil levels: a randomized phase 3 study. Chest 150, 789–798. 10.1016/j.chest.2016.03.032, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bleecker E. R., FitzGerald J. M., Chanez P., Papi A., Weinstein S. F., Barker P., et al. (2016). Efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma uncontrolled with high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists (SIROCCO): a randomized, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 388, 2115–2127. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31324-1, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bochner B. S., Gleich G. J. (2010). What targeting eosinophils has taught us about their role in diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 126, 16–25. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.02.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bousquet J., Chanez P., Lacoste J. Y., Barnèon G., Ghavanian N., Enander I., et al. (1990). Eosinophilic inflammation in asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 323, 1033–1039. 10.1056/NEJM199010113231505, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Broughton S. E., Dhagat U., Hercus T. R., Nero T. L., Grimbaldeston M. A., Bonder C. S., et al. (2012). The GM-CSF/IL-3/IL-5 cytokine receptor family: from ligand recognition to initiation of signaling. Immunol. Rev. 250, 277–302. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01164.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brusselle G., Germinaro M., Weiss S., Zangrilli J. (2017). Reslizumab in patients with inadequately controlled late-onset asthma and elevated blood eosinophils. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 43, 39–45. 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.01.011, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Brusselle G. G., Maes T., Bracke K. R. (2013). Eosinophils in the spotlight: Eosinophilic airway inflammation in non allergic asthma. Nat. Med. 19, 977–979. 10.1038/nm.3300, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Brussino L., Heffler E., Bucca C., Nicola S., Rolla G. (2018). Eosinophils target therapy for severe asthma: critical points. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018:7582057. 10.1155/2018/7582057, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Busse E., Bleecker R., FitzGerald J. M., Ferguson G. T., Barker P., Sproule S., et al. (2019). Long-term safety and efficacy of benralizumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma: 1-year results from the BORA phase 3 extension trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 7, 46–59. 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30406-5, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Castro M., Mathur S., Hargreave F., Boulet L. P., Xie F., Young J., et al. (2011). Reslizumab for poorly controlled, eosinophilic asthma: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 184, 1125–1132. 10.1164/rccm.201103-0396OC, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Castro M., Zangrilli J., Wechsler M. E., Bateman E. D., Brusselle G. G., Bardin P., et al. (2015). Reslizumab for inadequately controlled asthma with elevated blood eosinophil counts: results from two multicentre, parallel, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet Respir. Med. 3, 355–366. 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00042-9, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chipps B. E., Newbold P., Hirsch I., Trudo F., Goldman M. (2018). Benralizumab efficacy by atopy status and serum immunoglobulin E for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 120, 504–511. 10.1016/j.anai.2018.01.030, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cho J. Y., Miller M., Baek K. J., Han J. W., Nayar J., Lee S. Y. (2004). Inhibition of airway remodeling in IL-5-deficient mice. J. Clin. Invest. 113, 551–560. 10.1172/JCI19133, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chupp G. L., Bradford E. S., Albers F. C., Bratton D. J., Wang-Jairaj J., Nelsen L. M., et al. (2017). Efficacy of mepolizumab add-on therapy on health-related quality of life and markers of asthma control in severe eosinophilic asthma (MUSCA): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3b trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 5, 390–400. 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30125-X, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Devos R., Guisez Y., Plaetinck G., Cornelis S., Tavernier J., van der Heyden J., et al. (1994). Covalent modification of the interleukin-5 receptor by isothiazolones leads to inhibition of the binding of interleukin-5. Eur. J. Biochem. 225, 635–640. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.00635.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dorman S. C., Efthimiadis A., Babirad I., Watson R. M., Denburg J. A., Hargreave F. E., et al. (2004). Sputum CD34+ IL-5Rα+ cells increase after allergen: evidence for in situ eosinophilopoiesis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 169, 573–577. 10.1164/rccm.200307-1004OC, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dunican E. M., Fahy J. V. (2017). Asthma and corticosteroids: time for a more precise approach to treatment. Eur. Respir. J. 49:1701167. 10.1183/13993003.01167-2017, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Egan R. W., Athwal D., Bodmer M. W. (1999). Effect of Sch 55700, a humanized monoclonal antibody to human interleukin-5, on eosinophilic responses and bronchial hyperreactivity. Arzneimittelforschung 49, 779–790. 10.1055/s-0031-1300502, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Elbon C. L., Jacoby D. B., Fryer A. D. (1995). Pretreatment with an antibody to interleukin 5 prevents loss of pulmonary M2 muscarinic function in antigen challenged Guinea pigs. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 12, 320–328. 10.1165/ajrcmb.12.3.7873198, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fainardi V., Pisi G., Chetta A. (2016). Mepolizumab in the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. Immunotherapy 8, 27–34. 10.2217/imt.15.102, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ferguson G. T., FitzGerald J. M., Bleecker E. R., Laviolette M., Bernstein D., LaForce C., et al. (2017). Benralizumab for patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma (BISE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 5, 568–576. 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30190-X, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. FitzGerald J. M., Bleecker E. R., Nair P., Korn S., Ohta K., Lommatzsch M., et al. (2016). Benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody, as add-on treatment for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma (CALIMA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 388, 2128–2141. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31322-8, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Flood-Page P., Menzies-Gow A., Phipps S., Ying S., Wangoo A., Ludwig M. S., et al. (2003). Anti-IL-5 treatment reduces deposition of ECM proteins in the bronchial subepithelial basement membrane of mild atopic asthmatics. J. Clin. Invest. 112, 1029–1036. 10.1172/JCI17974, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Foster P. S., Hogan S. P., Ramsay A. J., Matthaei K. I., Young I. G. (1996). Interleukin 5 deficiency abolishes eosinophilia, airway hyperreactivity, and lung damage in a mouse asthma model. J. Exp. Med. 183, 195–201. 10.1084/jem.183.1.195, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Fulkerson P. C., Rothenberg M. E. (2013). Targeting eosinophils in allergy, inflammation and beyond. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 12, 117–129. 10.1038/nrd3838, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Galdiero M. R., Varricchi G., Seaf M., Marone G., Levi-Schaffer F., Marone G. (2017). Bidirectional mast cell-eosinophil interactions in inflammatory disorders and cancer. Front. Med. 4:103. 10.3389/fmed.2017.00103, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ghazi A., Trikha A., Calhoun W. J. (2012). Benralizumab – a humanized mAb to IL-5Rα with enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity – a novel approach for the treatment of asthma. Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther. 12, 113–118. 10.1517/14712598.2012.642359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Global Initiative for Asthma (2019). Update. Available at: www.ginasthma.org (Accessed October 1, 2019).
  40. Gnanakumaran G., Babu K. S. (2003). Technology evaluation: mepolizumab, GlaxoSmithKline. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 5, 321–325. PMID: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Gonzalez D., Benitez M., Quirce S. (2019). Benralizumab: a new approach for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 29, 84–93. 10.18176/jiaci.0385, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Greenfeder S., Umland S. P., Cuss F. M., Chapman R. W., Egan R. W. (2001). Th2 cytokines and asthma. The role of interleukin-5 in allergic eosinophilic disease. Respir. Res. 2, 71–79. 10.1186/rr41, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hakonarson H., Maskeri N., Carter C., Chuang S., Grunstein M. M. (1999). Autocrine interaction between IL-5 and IL-1beta mediates altered responsiveness of atopic asthmatic sensitized airway smooth muscle. J. Clin. Invest. 104, 657–667. 10.1172/JCI7137, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Haldar P. (2017). Patient profiles and clinical utility of mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma. Biol. Ther. Dent. 11, 81–95. 10.2147/BTT.S93954, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Haldar P., Brightling C. E., Hargadon B., Gupta S., Monteiro W., Sousa A., et al. (2009). Mepolizumab and exacerbations of refractory eosinophilic asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 973–984. 10.1056/NEJMoa0808991, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hart T. K., Cook R. M., Zia-Amirhosseini P., Minthorm E., Sellers T. S., Maleeff B. E., et al. (2001). Preclinical efficacy and safety of mepolizumab (SB-240563), a humanized monoclonal antibody to IL-5, in cynomolgus monkeys. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 108, 250–257. 10.1067/mai.2001.116576, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Heffler E., Malvezzi L., Boita M., Brussino L., De Virgilio A., Ferrando M., et al. (2018). Immunological mechanisms underlying chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Expert. Rev. Clin. Immunol. 14, 731–737. 10.1080/1744666X.2018.1512407, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Heffler E., Malvezzi L., Pirola F., Zieba N., Paoletti G., Mercante G., et al. (2019). Treatable traits in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 19, 373–378. 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000544, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hogan S. P., Rosenberg H. F., Moqbel R., Phipps S., Foster P. S., Lacy P., et al. (2008). Eosinophils: biological properties and role in health and disease. Clin. Exp. Allergy 38, 709–750. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02958.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Holgate S. T., Wenzel S., Postma D. S., Weiss S. T., Renz H., Sly D. (2015). Asthma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 1:15025. 10.1038/nrdp.2015.25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Houston J. C., De Navasquez S., Trounce J. R. (1953). A clinical and pathological study of fatal cases of status asthmaticus. Thorax 8, 207–213. 10.1136/thx.8.3.207, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Huber K. L., Koessler K. (1922). The pathology of bronchial asthma. Arch. Intern. Med. 30, 689–760. 10.1001/archinte.1922.00110120002001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ilmarinen P., Moilanen E., Kankaanranta H. (2014). Regulation of spontaneous eosinophil apoptosis – a neglected area of importance. J. Cell Death 7, 1–9. 10.4137/JCD.S13588, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ip W. K., Wong C. K., Wang C. B., Tian Y. P., Lam C. W. (2005). Interleukin-3, -5, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor induce adhesion and chemotaxis of human eosinophils via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor kappaB. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 27, 371–393. 10.1080/08923970500240925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ishino T., Harrington A. E., Gopi H., Chaiken I. (2008). Structure-based rationale for interleukin 5 receptor antagonism. Curr. Pharm. Des. 14, 1231–1239. 10.2174/138161208784246144, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ishino T., Pasut G., Scibek J., Chaiken I. (2004). Kinetic interaction analysis of human interleukin 5 receptor α mutants reveals a unique binding topology and charge distribution for cytokine recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 9547–9556. 10.1074/jbc.M309327200, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Johanson K., Appelbaum E., Doyle M., Hensley P., Zhao B., Abdel-Meguid S. S., et al. (1995). Binding interactions of human interleukin 5 with its receptor α subunit. Large scale production, structural, and functional studies of Drosophila-expressed recombinant proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 9459–9471. 10.1074/jbc.270.16.9459, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Johansson M. V. (2017). Eosinophil activation status in separate compartments and association with asthma. Front. Med. 4:75. 10.3389/fmed.2017.00075, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kandikattu H. K., Venkateshaiah S. U., Mishra A. (2019). Synergy of interleukin (IL)-5 and IL-18 in eosinophil mediated pathogenesis of allergic diseases. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 47, 83–98. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2019.05.003, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kay A. B., Phipps S., Robinson D. S. (2004). A role for eosinophils in airway remodelling in asthma. Trends Immunol. 25, 477–482. 10.1016/j.it.2004.07.006, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kips J. C., O’Connor B. J., Langley S. J., Woodcock A., Kerstjens H. A., Postma D. S., et al. (2003). Effects of SCH55700, a humanized anti-human interleukin-5 antibody, in severe persistent asthma: a pilot study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 167, 1655–1659. 10.1164/rccm.200206-525OC, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Koike M., Nakamura K., Furuya A., Iida A., Anazawa H., Takatsu K., et al. (2009). Establishment of humanized anti-interelukin-5 receptor α chain monoclonal antibodies having a potent neutralizing activity. Hum. Antibodies 18, 17–27. 10.3233/HAB-2009-0198, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kolbeck R., Kozhich A., Koike M., Peng L., Andersson C. K., Damschroder M. M., et al. (2010). Medi-563, a humanized anti-IL-5 receptor α mAb with enhanced antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity function. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 125, 1344–1353. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.04.004, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kopf M., Brombacher F., Hodgkin P. D., Ramsay A. J., Milbourne E. A., Dai W. J., et al. (1996). IL-5 deficient mice have a developmental defect in CD5+ B-1 cells and lack eosinophilia but have normal antibody and cytotoxic T cell responses. Immunity 4, 15–24. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80294-0, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Kouro T., Takatsu K. (2009). IL-5- and eosinophil-mediated inflammation: from discovery to therapy. Int. Immunol. 21, 1303–1309. 10.1093/intimm/dxp102, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kung T. T., Jones H., Adams G. K., III., Umland S. P., Kreutner W., Egan R. W., et al. (1994). Characterization of a murine model of allergic pulmonary inflammation. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 105, 83–90. 10.1159/000236807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kung T. T., Stelts D. M., Zurcher J. A., Adams G. K., III., Egan R. W., Kreutner W., et al. (1995). Involvement of IL-5 in a murine model of allergic pulmonary inflammation: prophylactic and therapeutic effect of an anti-IL-5 antibody. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 13, 360–365. 10.1165/ajrcmb.13.3.7654390, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lambrecht B. N., Hammad H. (2015). The immunology of asthma. Nat. Immunol. 16, 45–56. 10.1038/ni.3049, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Lambrecht B. N., Hammad H., Fahy J. V. (2019). The cytokines of asthma. Immunity 50, 975–991. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.018, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Lilly C. M., Chapman R. W., Sehring S. J., Mauser P. J., Egan R. W., Drazen J. M. (1996). Effects of interleukin 5-induced pulmonary eosinophilia on airway reactivity in the Guinea pig. Am. J. Phys. 270, L368–L375. 10.1152/ajplung.1996.270.3.L368, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Makinde T., Murphy R. F., Agrawall D. K. (2007). The regulatory role of TGF-beta in airway remodeling in asthma. Immunol. Cell Biol. 85, 348–356. 10.1038/sj.icb.7100044, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Marichal T., Mesnil C., Bureau F. (2017). Homeostatic eosinophils: characteristics and functions. Front. Med. 4:101. 10.3389/fmed.2017.00101, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Mauser P. J., Pitman A. M., Fernandez X., Foran S. K., Adams G. K., III., Kreutner W., et al. (1995). Effects of an antibody to interleukin-5 in a monkey model of asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 152, 467–472. 10.1164/ajrccm.152.2.7633694, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Mauser P. J., Pitman A., Witt A., Fernandez X., Zurcher J., Kung T., et al. (1993). Inhibitory effect of the TRFK-5 anti-IL-5 antibody in a Guinea pig model of asthma. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 148, 1623–1628. 10.1164/ajrccm/148.6_Pt_1.1623, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. McGregor M. C., Krings J. G., Nair P., Castro M. (2019). Role of biologics in asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 199, 433–445. 10.1164/rccm.201810-1944CI, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Minai-Fleminger Y., Elishmereni M., Vita F., Soranzo M. R., Mankuta D., Zabucchi G., et al. (2010). Ultrastructural evidence for human mast cell-eosinophil interactions in vitro. Cell Tissue Res. 341, 405–415. 10.1007/s00441-010-1010-8, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Molfino N. A., Gossage D., Kolbeck R., Parker J. M., Geba G. P. (2012). Molecular and clinical rationale for therapeutic targeting of interleukin-5 and its receptor. Clin. Exp. Allergy 42, 712–737. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03854.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Murphy J. M., Young I. G. (2006). IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF signaling crystal structure of the human beta-common receptor. Vitam. Horm. 74, 1–30. 10.1016/S0083-6729(06)74001-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Nair P., Pizzichini M. M., Kjarsgaard M., Inman M. D., Efthimiadis A., Pizzichini E., et al. (2009). Mepolizumab for prednisone-dependent asthma with sputum eosinophilia. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 985–993. 10.1056/NEJMoa0805435, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Nair P., Wenzel S., Rabe K. F., Bourdin A., Lugogo N. L., Kuna P., et al. (2017). Oral glucocorticoid-sparing effect of benralizumab in severe asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 2448–2458. 10.1056/NEJMoa1703501, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Ohnishi T., Sur S., Collins D. S., Fish J. E., Gleich G. J., Peters S. P. (1993). Eosinophil survival activity identified as interleukin-5 is associated with eosinophil recruitment and degranulation and lung injury twenty-four hours after segmental antigen lung challenge. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 92, 607–615. 10.1016/0091-6749(93)90085-T, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ortega H. G., Liu M. C., Pavord I. D., Brusselle G. G., FitzGerald J. M., Chetta A., et al. (2014). Mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 1198–1207. 10.1056/NEJMoa1403290, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Park S. W., Kim D., Chang H. S., Park S. J., Lee Y. M., Park J. S., et al. (2003). Association of interleukin-5 and eotaxin with acute exacerbation of asthma. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 131, 283–290. 10.1159/000072140, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Pavord I. D., Korn S., Howarth P., Bleecker E. R., Buhl R., Keene O. N., et al. (2012). Mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma (DREAM): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 380, 651–659. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60988-X, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Pazdrak K., Olszewska-Pazdrak B., Stafford S., Garofalo R. P., Alam R. (1998). Lyn, Jak2, and Raf-1 kinases are critical for the antiapoptotic effect of interleukin-5, whereas only Raf-1 kinase is essential for eosinophil activation and degranulation. J. Exp. Med. 188, 421–429. 10.1084/jem.188.3.421, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Pazdrak K., Stafford S., Alam R. (1995). The activation of the Jak-STAT 1 signalling pathway by IL-5 in eosinophils. J. Immunol. 155, 397–402. PMID: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Pelaia C., Busceti M. T., Solinas S., Terracciano R., Pelaia G. (2018a). Real-life evaluation of the clinical, functional, and hematological effects of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: results of a single-centre observational study. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 53, 1–5. 10.1016/j.pupt.2018.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Pelaia C., Busceti M. T., Vatrella A., Rago G. F., Crimi C., Terracciano R., et al. (2019). Real-life rapidity of benralizumab effects in patients with severe allergic asthma: assessment of blood eosinophils, symptom control, lung function and oral corticosteroid intake after the first drug dose. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 58101830. 10.1016/j.pupt.2019.101830, PMID: [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Pelaia C., Calabrese C., Vatrella A., Busceti M. T., Garofalo E., Lombardo N., et al. (2018c). Benralizumab: from the basic mechanism of action to the potential use in the biological therapy of severe eosinophilic asthma. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018:4839230. 10.1155/2018/4839230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Pelaia G., Cuda G., Vatrella A., Gallelli L., Caraglia M., Marra M., et al. (2005). Mitogen-activated protein kinases and asthma. J. Cell. Physiol. 202, 642–653. 10.1002/jcp.20169, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Pelaia C., Vatrella A., Bruni A., Terracciano R., Pelaia G. (2018b). Benralizumab in the treatment of severe asthma: design, development and potential place in therapy. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 12, 619–628. 10.2147/DDDT.S155307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Pelaia G., Vatrella A., Busceti M. T., Gallelli L., Calabrese C., Terracciano R., et al. (2015). Cellular mechanisms underlying eosinophilic and neutrophilic airway inflammation in asthma. Mediat. Inflamm. 2015:879783. 10.1155/2015/879783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Pelaia G., Vatrella A., Busceti M. T., Gallelli L., Preianò M., Lombardo N., et al. (2016). Role of biologics in severe eosinophilic asthma: focus on reslizumab. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 12, 1075–1082. 10.2147/TCRM.S111862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Pelaia C., Vatrella A., Busceti M. T., Gallelli L., Terracciano R., Savino R., et al. (2017). Severe eosinophilic asthma: from the pathogenic role of interleukin-5 to the therapeutic action of mepolizumab. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 11, 3137–3144. 10.2147/DDDT.S150656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Rossjohn J., McKinstry W. J., Woodcock J. M., McClure B. J., Hercus T. R., Parker M. W., et al. (2000). Structure of the activation domain of the GM-CSF/IL-3/IL-5 receptor common beta-chain bound to an antagonist. Blood 95, 2491–2498. 10.1182/blood.V95.8.2491, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Sakuishi K., Oki S., Araki M., Porcelli S. A., Miyake S., Yamamura T. (2007). Invariant NKT cells biased for IL-5 production act as crucial regulators of inflammation. J. Immunol. 179, 3452–3462. 10.4049/jimmunol.179.6.3452, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Sano M., Leff A. R., Myou S., Boetticher E., Meliton A. Y., Learoyd J., et al. (2005). Regulation of interleukin-5-induced beta2-integrin adhesion of human eosinophils by phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 33, 65–70. 10.1165/rcmb.2005-0076OC, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Schleich F., Brusselle G., Louis R., Vandenplas O., Michils A., Pilette C., et al. (2014). Heterogeneity of phenotypes in severe asthma. The Belgian severe asthma registry (BSAR). Respir. Med. 108, 1723–1732. 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.10.007, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Schwartz C., Willebrand R., Huber S., Rupec R. A., Wu D., Locksley R., et al. (2015). Eosinophil-specific deletion of IκBα in mice reveals a critical role of NFκB-induced Bcl-xL for inhibition of apoptosis. Blood 125, 3896–3904. 10.1182/blood-2014-10-607788, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Shakoory B., Fitzgerald S. M., Lee S. A., Chi D. S., Krishnaswamy G. (2004). The role of human mast cell-derived cytokines in eosinophil biology. J. Interf. Cytokine Res. 24, 271–281. 10.1089/107999004323065057, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Shields R. L., Lai J., Keck R., O’Connell L. Y., Hong K., Meng Y. G., et al. (2002). Lack of fucose on human IgG1 N-linked oligosaccharide improves binding to Fcgamma RIII and antibody-dependent cellular toxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 26733–26740. 10.1074/jbc.M202069200, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Siddiqui S., Denlinger L. C., Fowler S. J., Akuthota P., Shaw D. E., Heaney L. G., et al. (2019). Unmet needs in severe asthma subtyping and precision medicine trials. Bridging clinical and patient perspectives. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 199, 823–829. 10.1164/rccm.201809-1817PP, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Smith S. G., Chen R., Kjarsgaard M., Huang C., Oliveria J. P., O’Byrne P. M., et al. (2016). Increased numbers of activated group 2 innate lymphoid cells in the airways of patients with severe asthma and persistent airway eosinophilia. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 137, 75–86. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.05.037, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Stirling R. G., van Rensen E. I., Barnes P. J., Chung K. F. (2001). Interleukin-5 induces CD34+ eosinophil progenitor mobilization and eosinophil CCR3 expression in asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 164, 1403–1409. 10.1164/ajrccm.164.8.2010002, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Stout B. A., Bates M. E., Liu L. Y., Farrington N. N., Bertics P. J. (2004). IL-5 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor acyivate STAT3 and STAT5 and promote Pim-1 and cyclin D3 protein expression in human eosinophils. J. Immunol. 173, 6409–6417. 10.4049/jimmunol.173.10.6409, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Takatsu K., Nakajima H. (2008). IL-5 and eosinophilia. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 20, 288–294. 10.1016/j.coi.2008.04.001, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Tanaka H., Komai M., Nagao K. (2004). Role of IL-5 and eosinophils in allergen-induced airway remodeling in mice. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 31, 62–68. 10.1165/rcmb.2003-0305OC, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Thompson-Souza G. A., Gropillo I., Neves J. S. (2017). Cysteynil leukotrienes in eosinophil biology: functional roles and therapeutic perspectives in eosinophilic disorders. Front. Med. 4:106. 10.3389/fmed.2017.00106, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Uings I., McKinnon M. (2002). Development of IL-5 receptor antagonists. Curr. Pharm. Des. 8, 1837–1844. 10.2174/1381612023393800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Varricchi G., Bagnasco D., Borriello F., Heffler E., Canonica G. W. (2016). Interleukin-5 pathway inhibition in the treatment of eosinophilic respiratory disorders: evidence and unmet needs. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 16, 186–200. 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000251, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Varricchi G., Bagnasco D., Ferrando M., Puggioni F., Passalacqua G., Canonica G. W. (2017a). Mepolizumab in the management of severe eosinophilic asthma in adults: current evidence and practical experience. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 11, 40–45. 10.1177/1753465816673303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Varricchi G., Canonica G. W. (2016). The role of interleukin-5 in asthma. Expert. Rev. Clin. Immunol. 12, 903–905. 10.1080/1744666X.2016.1208564, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Varricchi G., Senna G., Loffredo S., Bagnasco D., Ferrando M., Canonica G. W. (2017b). Reslizumab and eosinophilic asthma: one step closer to precision medicine? Front. Immunol. 8:242. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Walker J. A., Barlow J. L., McKenzie A. M. (2013). Innate lymphoid cells: how did we miss them? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 75–87. 10.1038/nri3349, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Walsh G. M. (2015). Mepolizumab-based therapy in asthma: an update. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 15, 392–396. 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000183, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Wood L. J., Sehmi R., Dorman S., Hamid Q., Tulic M. K., Watson R. M., et al. (2002). Allergen-induced increases in bone marrow T lymphocytes and interleukin-5 expression in subjects with asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 166, 883–889. 10.1164/rccm.2108015, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Woodruff P. G., Modrek B., Choy D. F., Jia G., Abbas A. R., Ellwanger A., et al. (2009). T-helper type 2-driven inflammation defines major subphenotypes of asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 180, 388–395. 10.1164/rccm.200903-0392OC, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Xu J., Jiang F., Nayeri F., Zetterstrom O. (2007). Apoptotic eosinophils in sputum from asthmatic patients correlate negatively with levels of IL-5 and eotaxin. Respir. Med. 101, 1447–1454. 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.01.026, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Yanagibashi T., Satoh T. M., Nagai Y., Koike M., Takatsu K. (2017). Allergic diseases: from bench to clinic – contribution of the discovery of IL-5. Cytokine 98, 59–70. 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Zhang J., Kuvelkar R., Murgolo N. J., Taremi S. S., Chou C. C., Wang P., et al. (1999). Mapping and characterization of the epitope(s) of Sch 55700, a humanized mAb, that inhibits human IL-5. Int. Immunol. 11, 1935–1944. 10.1093/intimm/11.12.1935, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Zhang X., Moilanen C. E., Kankaanranta H. (2000). Enhancement of human eosinophil apoptosis by fluticasone propionate, budesonide, and beclomethasone. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 406, 325–332. 10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00690-7, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES