Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 23;9:19681. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56091-w

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Lacunarity curves of 49 cities (in grey) and the four archetype cities (in colour) shown on a log(Λ) vs log(r) plot. The cities with a concave downwards shape in the upper side of the diagonal indicate larger and more aggregated gaps, whereas cities underneath the curve indicate a more uniform dispersed pattern of islets and smaller gaps. (b) Histogram of Λscore of 49 cities (mean = 0.04, s.d. = 0.38). (c) Scatter plot of percolation transition range and Lacunarity score. This figure illustrates the classification of cities into the 2 classes based on Lacunarity Score and the type of transition. (d) Scatter plot of Mean Relative Heat Islet Size (AM) versus Λscore. Additionally, since the islet-size distribution is heavy tailed, in addition to the AM, the largest islet size (AL, as a percentage of the total city area) is indicated using the marker size. The AM and AL serve to illustrate the size distribution of the hottest islets occupying the ten percent of the city area.