Table 2.
Fit indices – “collaboration” and “social conflict” subscale.
| Subscale | χ2 (gdl) | NNFI | CFI | SRMR | RMSEA | ρ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collaboration | ||||||
| All items | 346.816b (13) | 0.77 | 0.86 | 0.08c | 0.18 | 0.86 |
| Removing items with lower saturationc | ||||||
| Without item 8 | 250.394b(8) | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.86 |
| Without item 8-13 | 32.904a (4) | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.02 | 0.09d | 0.85 |
| Social conflict | ||||||
| All items | 242.779b(13) | 0.77 | 0.90 | 0.07c | 0.15 | 0.93 |
| Removing items with lower saturationc | ||||||
| Without item 5 | 125.506b(8) | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.80 |
| Without item 5-19 | 13.202b(4) | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.80 |
| Without item 5-19-9 | 3.754b(1) | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.80 |
The probability value for the chi-square statistic is 0.00000. However, x2 is sensitive to the sample size; with a large sample size it is highly probable to have a p-value <.05, even if the model fits the data (Corbetta, 1992).
MacCallum et al. (1996) suggest that values from 0.08 to 0.10 indicate a mediocre, but still acceptable fit.
The numbering of the items shown here corresponds to the order in which they are presented in the original scale.
MacCallum et al. (1996) suggest that values from 0.08 to 0.10 indicate a mediocre, but still acceptable fit.