. 2019 Dec 23;9:19663. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55895-0

Table 1.

Proline content of the GM soybean lines of the T2 generation and the WT plants after being subjected to salt treatment for seven days.

Non-transgenic plants and GM soybean lines	Proline content of plants under normal conditions (μmol/g)^A	Change in proline content of GM soybean lines after being subjected to salt stress for 7 days
Non-transgenic plants and GM soybean lines		Proline content (μmol/g)^B	Rate of increase compared to normal condition (%)	Rate of increase compared to non-transgenic plants (%)
WT	1.57^a ± 0.027	3.74^a ± 0.081	238.22	100.00
T2-2	1.84^b ± 0.041	4.56^b ± 0.099	247.83	121.93
T2-4	2.32^c ± 0.034	6.16^c ± 0.044	265.52	164.71
T2-7	2.59^c ± 0.029	7.77^d ± 0.069	300.00	207.75
T2-10	2.34^c ± 0.056	6.29^c ± 0.042	268.80	168.18

Note: WT: Wild-type; T2-2, T2-4, T2-7, T2-10: GM soybean lines of T2 generation. ^A,B Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences as measured by Duncan’s test at P < 0.001. The symbol ± represents the standard error.