Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2019 Sep 5;50(11):3702–3712. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14554

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PMC Copyright notice

Multisensory enhancement. Top Row: Performance levels after visual stimulus intensities were adjusted to mitigate/eliminate preference in the choice paradigm (same as Figure 3, middle row) (N = 200 trials/animal). Middle Row: Coupling the auditory and visual stimuli in the previously blind (right) hemifield biased preference toward that cross‐modal stimulus (F1: 46.7% to 53.1%, p = .035; F2: 56.1% to 87.5%, p = 7.4e−8; F3: 47.5% to 78.3% and p = 9.5e−7). Bottom Row: A shift in preference (from top row) to the cross‐modal stimulus was also produced in the normal (left) hemifield (F1: 51.9% to 64%, p = .013; F2: 42.4% to 46.7%, p = .041 and F3: 50.5% to 69%, p = .0014). Note that the preference was no greater than in the previously blind hemifield (p = .59)