Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan;66(1 Suppl):S3–S8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.10.006

Table 3.

Predicting attitudinal acceptance of IPV for females, adjusted odds ratios (aOR)

Nigeria aOR (95% CI) Tanzania aOR (95% CI)
Age .99 (.95–1.03) 1.06 (1.00–1.13)
Marriage 1.67** (1.20–2.33) 1.44 (.97–2.14)
Experienced IPV, last 12 months 1.85* (1.11–3.07) 1.61 (.33–7.83)
Marriage × experienced IPV, last 12 months 3.42** (1.72–6.80) 2.60 (.99–6.86)
Schooling level (reference group = no schooling)
 Attended primary, but did not complete (Nigeria)/attended at least primary (Tanzania) .62 (.31–1.22) 1.76 (.89–3.49)
 Completed primary (Nigeria)/attended at least secondary (Tanzania) 1.22 (.83–1.80) 1.38 (.63–3.02)
 Completed secondary (Nigeria)/attended more than secondary (Tanzania) .7 (.43–1.13) .29 (.03–3.32)
 Completed more than secondary .62 (.28–1.09)

Marriage is defined as being in a formal marriage or living with someone as if married. Standard errors are adjusted for complex sampling design. All observations are weighted to be representative of the population. Odds ratios are significant at *p < .05 and **p < .01.

CI = confidence interval; IPV = intimate partner violence.