Table 3.
InDel Markers a | Genetic Distance (cM) | Composite Interval Mapping Results | Mean AUDPC of Three Genotypic Classes in F2 Plants g | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOD b | R2 (%) c | A d | D e | DR f | B:B | A:A | A:B | ||
ID10-178408813 | 63.6 | 7.47 | 13.65 | 0.81 | −0.21 | 0.52 | 7.30 | 33.80 | 16.87 |
ID10-182178715 | 64.9 | 8.12 | 14.00 | 0.86 | −0.20 | 0.46 | 7.69 | 33.97 | 17.71 |
ID10-185236974 | 66.8 | 8.37 | 17.82 | 0.94 | −0.17 | 0.37 | 7.12 | 35.00 | 17.60 |
ID10-186260160 | 66.5 | 8.37 | 17.82 | 0.87 | −0.21 | 0.47 | 7.04 | 34.91 | 17.74 |
ID10-190060186 | 66.6 | 8.38 | 17.82 | 0.87 | −0.21 | 0.47 | 7.12 | 34.91 | 17.74 |
ID10-194305124 | 71.0 | 9.93 | 19.01 | 0.97 | −0.10 | 0.21 | 6.36 | 35.52 | 18.05 |
ID10-196208712 | 72.3 | 3.59 | 18.41 | 0.73 | −0.13 | 0.35 | 7.45 | 35.55 | 17.85 |
a Markers were named based on the physical positions in reference genome CM334 (v.1.55). b LOD, log-likelihood. c R2 (%), percentage of variation explained by each maker. d A, value of the additive effect of each maker. e D, value of the dominance effect of each marker. A negative sign indicates that the increasing resistance of the QTL alleles was contributed by the resistant parent. f 2|d/a|, dominance ratio (DR), with a and d being the additive and dominance estimates, respectively. DR < 0.2 (additive), 0.2 < DR < 0.8 (partially dominant), 0.8 < DR < 1.2 (dominant), DR >1.2 (overdominant). g AUDPC, area under the disease progress curve. Lower mean AUDPC was associated with greater plant disease. B:B, allele of resistant line BVRC 1; A:A, allele of susceptible line BVRC25; A:B, heterozygous genotype.