Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 29;19(23):5276. doi: 10.3390/s19235276

Table 2.

The overall accuracy of different models in Indian Pines 1.

Model\Amount of Training Samples 20% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2%
2D-CNN 91.23 ± 0.21 83.86 ± 1.00 82.43 ± 0.62 78.59 ± 0.79 74.92 ± 0.98 67.13 ± 1.12
M3D-DCNN 90.03 ± 2.18 80.10 ± 4.56 78.04 ± 2.13 74.57 ± 2.63 70.48 ± 3.21 62.28 ± 3.18
HybridSN 99.30 ± 0.18 97.66 ± 0.23 96.37 ± 1.19 93.64 ± 4.40 91.88 ± 1.39 83.14 ± 1.60
Model A 99.21 ± 0.24 96.94 ± 0.59 97.03 ± 0.43 93.80 ± 0.97 91.20 ± 1.61 81.97 ± 2.28
Model B 99.12 ± 0.20 96.47 ± 0.59 95.09 ± 0.52 91.46 ± 1.40 87.25 ± 1.07 73.81 ± 3.33
R-HybridSN 99.52 ± 0.16 98.44 ± 0.44 98.12 ± 0.35 96.69 ± 0.70 94.99 ± 0.39 86.67 ± 1.02

1 The standard deviation is shown after ±.