Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 29;19(23):5276. doi: 10.3390/s19235276

Table 4.

The overall accuracy of different models in University of Pavia.

Model\Amount of Training Samples 5% 2% 1.6% 1.2% 0.8% 0.4%
2D-CNN 96.59 ± 0.21 94.50 ± 0.40 93.55 ± 0.22 91.82 ± 0.56 89.98 ± 0.38 85.27 ± 0.90
M3D-DCNN 92.80 ± 0.95 89.27 ± 1.35 88.28 ± 1.47 87.19 ± 1.71 82.75 ± 2.84 76.53 ± 3.94
HybridSN 99.45 ± 0.09 97.86 ± 0.56 96.87 ± 0.31 95.86 ± 0.93 93.30 ± 1.41 85.95 ± 1.58
Model A 99.37 ± 0.12 97.99 ± 0.53 97.83 ± 0.64 95.01 ± 1.44 93.98 ± 1.70 90.85 ± 1.51
Model B 99.03 ± 0.10 96.89 ± 0.59 96.45 ± 1.02 88.54 ± 4.45 91.05 ± 2.33 81.06 ± 3.21
R-HybridSN 99.47 ± 0.14 98.47 ± 0.27 98.30 ± 0.21 96.40 ± 1.66 95.64 ± 0.52 91.60 ± 1.12