Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jan 13;50(3):725–732. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26632

Table 1.

Comparison of IP and SPURS initialization methods on a single scanner over 5 healthy subjects. Initialization time and ROI values for liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF), R2* and susceptibility are tabulated. p-value for the paired t-test and coefficient of determination (r2), and slope (k) for linear regression are tabulated for ROI data.

Healthy subject # Initialization (min) PDFF (%) R2* (Hz) QSM (ppm)
IP SPURS IP SPURS IP SPURS IP SPURS
1 7 76 2.5 2.5 31 31 −0.11 −0.14
2 8 26 2.1 2.1 37 37 0.004 0.01
3 7 31 2 2 30 30 0.06 0.09
4 9 60 4.4 4.4 31 31 −0.005 −.005
5 10 54 2.3 2.3 44 44 0.12 0.11
p-value 1 1 0.98
r2 1 1 0.96
K 1 1 1.14