Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jan 13;50(3):725–732. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26632

Table 3.

Comparison of IP and SPURS initialization methods on a single scanner over 19 patients. Initialization time and ROI values for liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF), R2* and susceptibility are tabulated. p-value for the paired t-test and coefficient of determination (r2), and slope (k) for linear regression are tabulated for ROI data.

Patient subject # Initialization (min) PDFF (%) R2* (Hz) QSM (ppm)
IP SPURS IP SPURS IP SPURS IP SPURS
1 7 60 2.8 2.8 171 171 0.37 0.39
2 7 23 2.3 2.3 245 245 0.44 0.44
3 7 19 2.4 2.4 80 80 0.25 0.25
4 7 25 1.5 1.5 45 45 0.09 0.09
5 7 24 1.9 1.9 33 33 0.10 0.10
6 8 25 2.5 2.5 37 37 0.10 0.10
7 8 35 8.6 8.4 388 401 0.57 0.59
8 7 31 1.7 1.7 28 28 0.07 0.07
9 7 43 1.6 1.6 140 140 0.32 0.35
10 6 32 1.6 1.6 38 38 0.14 0.14
11 11 76 5.8 5.8 23 23 0.09 0.08
12 7 58 2 2 31 31 0.04 0.04
13 7 72 1.5 1.5 25 25 0.04 0.03
14 8 43 3.2 3.2 27 27 0.04 0.04
15 9 38 1 1 29 29 0.08 0.08
16 7 46 5.8 5.8 225 225 0.39 0.39
17 8 50 1.2 1.2 30 30 0.05 0.05
18 8 31 4.9 4.9 241 241 0.44 0.44
19 7 27 1.9 1.9 66 66 0.16 0.16
p-value 0.99 0.98 0.96
r2 1.00 1.00 1.00
k 0.98 1.02 1.03