Table 2.
Performances of DDI-PULearn and the benchmark methods evaluated by 20 runs of 3-fold cross-validation and 5-fold cross-validation
| Evaluation | Method | Precision | Recall | F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-fold CV | Vilar’s substructure-based method | 0.145 | 0.535 | 0.229 |
| Vilar’s interaction-fingerprint-based method | 0.377 | 0.553 | 0.447 | |
| Zhang’s weighted average ensemble method | 0.782 | 0.703 | 0.740 | |
| Zhang’s L1 classifier ensemble method | 0.788 | 0.717 | 0.751 | |
| Zhang’s L2 classifier ensemble method | 0.784 | 0.712 | 0.746 | |
| DDI-PULearn | 0.902 | 0.822 | 0.860 | |
| 5-fold CV | Vilar’s substructure-based method | 0.145 | 0.535 | 0.229 |
| Vilar’s interaction-fingerprint-based method | 0.377 | 0.553 | 0.447 | |
| Zhang’s weighted average ensemble method | 0.775 | 0.659 | 0.712 | |
| Zhang’s L1 classifier ensemble method | 0.785 | 0.670 | 0.723 | |
| Zhang’s L2 classifier ensemble method | 0.783 | 0.665 | 0.719 | |
| DDI-PULearn | 0.904 | 0.824 | 0.862 |