Table 4.
Loci significantly associated with fruit shape index as identified by association analysis
| Locia | CM334 (v.1.55) [13] | Zunla-1 (v2.0) [3] | p-value | Phenotypic variation explained (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chr. | Physical position (bp) | Chr. | Physical position (bp) | |||
| CaSSR013 | 1 | 2,895,632 | 1 | 2,383,961 | 2.16E-06 | 9.7 |
| CaSSR090 | 2 | 153,032,594 | 2 | 143,851,440 | 1.36E-06 | 8.2 |
| CaSSR105 | 3 | 143,624,183 | 3 | 95,195,822 | 6.99E-05 | 9.1 |
| CaSSR091 | 4 | 762,569 | 4 | 214,859,753 | 2.17E-05 | 8.9 |
| CaSSR039 | 4 | ND | 4 | 215,677,699 | 1.99E-05 | 8.9 |
| CaSSR044 | 6 | 234,686,966 | 6 | 1,041,327 | 6.95E-08 | 12.7 |
| CaSSR107 | 6 | 193,777,105 | 6 | 39,731,428 | 1.88E-05 | 12.4 |
| CaSSR077 | 12 | 226,618,758 | 12 | 9,517,953 | 7.54E-08 | 10.1 |
| CaSNP112 | 12 | 47,349,405 | 12 | 181,587,490 | 8.45E-06 | 7.9 |
aThe interval between CaSSR091 and CaSSR039 was within ~ 820 kb; thus, these two loci were considered at the same associated region