Table 12.

Comparison of the overall success rate with eight state-of-the-art methods

Method	Overall success rate
	Dataset 1	Dataset 2
AAC based on Covariance [9]	37.2%	—
PsePSSM based on ensemble method [9]	91.6%	78.3%
Physicochemical properties based on ensemble method [13]	91.0%	—
Fusion representation based on SVM [16]	92.6%	88.2%
PsePSSM based on LLDA and ensemble method [22]	88.7%	—
PsePSSM and DC based on GPP and KNN [20]	90.2%	—
PsePSSM based on PCA and KNN [22]	80.66%	—
Previous work [19]	93.49%	—
This paper	95.68%	92.98%

Note: Best performing method in bold.