Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 9;48(6):1992–2000. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz202

Table 2.

Indirect and total associations of the intervention, sanitation coverage, on-premise piped water coverage and handwashing station coverage with child height-for-age z scorea

Unstandardized coefficient (95% CI) Standardized coefficient (95% CI) P-value
Sanitation pathway (b → c)
 Total association 0.196 (0.088, 0.304) 0.084 (0.038, 0.129) <0.001
Water pathways
 Water 1 (e → c) 0.041 (0.010, 0.073) 0.017 (0.004, 0.000) 0.011
 Water 2 (g → f → c) −0.005 (−0.010, 0.073) −0.002 (−0.004, 0.000) 0.103
 Water 3 (g → m) 0.010 (−0.054, 0.074) 0.004 (−0.023, 0.031) 0.762
 Water 4 (g → j → l) 0.000 (−0.002, 0.002) 0.000 (−0.001, 0.001) 0.899
 Water 5 (g → i → k) 0.000 (−0.003, 0.004) 0.000 (−0.001, 0.002) 0.936
 Water 6 (h → k) 0.001 (−0.032, 0.035) 0.001 (−0.013, 0.014) 0.935
 Total association 0.048 (−0.020, 0.117) 0.020 (−0.008, 0.048) 0.168
Hygiene pathway (k)
 Total association 0.008 (−0.181, 0.197) 0.003 (−0.069, 0.075) 0.936
Intervention (sanitation and water pathways)
 Total association 0.139 (0.060, 0.218) 0.060 (0.026, 0.093) 0.001
a

Adjusted for household wealth, caste/tribe, caregiver’s education, household food insecurity, livestock ownership and minimum dietary diversity.