Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 1;10(1):281–299. doi: 10.7150/thno.35568

Table 1.

Nanoparticle-based platforms for RNA delivery

Nanocarriers Classifications Advantages Disadvantages
Lipid-based nanostructures Liposomes; solid lipid nanoparticles; lipid emulsions Easy preparation, good biocompatibility and biodegradability Limited stability, easy leakage of payloads, and rapid clearance
Polymer-based nanomaterials Natural or naturally derived polymers: chitosan, poly-l-lysine, atelocollagen, etc.
Synthetic polymers: PLGA, PEI, PVA, PLA, PEG, etc.
Good biocompatibility and biodegradability for natural or naturally derived polymers, low cost of production, stimulation of drug release, easy modification Nondegradable for some responsive polymers, dose-dependent toxicity
Inorganic NPs MSNs, CNTs, QDs, and metal nanoparticles (e.g., iron oxide and gold nanoparticles) Easy surface modification, good reproducibility, and easy cell uptake Non-biodegradability, potential toxicity
Bio-inspired nano-vehicles DNA-based nanostructures, exosome-mimetic nanovesicles, red blood cell member-based ghosts Good biodegradability, low toxicity, strong targeting and low immune induction High cost, stability concern