Dopamine D2 receptor antagonist |
Snape et al.34 (1982) |
Metoclopramide (10 mg orally, four times per day)
Placebo (two 3-week treatment INT with a 1-week washout period before cross-over)
|
|
|
|
McCallum et al.35 (1983) |
|
|
|
Restlessness, amenorrhea, headache, constipation and leg cramps were noted in the metoclopramide group
|
Ricci et al.36 (1985) |
|
Significant improvement of fullness, bloating, nausea and anorexia when compared to placebo (P <0.05)
No significant correlation between changes in symptoms and GE improvement
|
|
|
Parkman et al.33 (2014) |
Metoclopramide (10 mg orally, four times per day; n = 18)
Metoclopramide (10 mg nasal spray, four times per day; n = 35)
Metoclopramide (20 mg nasal spray, four times per day; n = 36)
|
|
|
Three subjects discontinued the study due to severe restlessness, severe drowsiness and mild headache.
Nausea was more frequently reported in the oral group
|
Parkman et al.44 (2015) |
Metoclopramide (10 mg nasal spray, four times per day; n = 95)
Metoclopramide (14 mg nasal spray, four times per day; n = 95)
Placebo (n = 95)
|
|
|
AEs were mild to moderate. They were more frequent in the 14 mg (8.4%, including headache, dizziness, diarrhoea, cholelithiasis, vomiting and nausea) rather than the 10 mg group (nausea, myoclonus, and memory impairment)
|
Patterson et al.37 (1999) |
The following regimens were given for 4 weeks:
|
|
|
Somnolence, anxiety, akathisia and depression were significantly more severe in the metoclopramide group after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment (P <0.001)
Severe CNS events accounted for treatment discontinuation in four patients and one patient in the metoclopramide and domperidone groups, respectively
|
Silvers et al.45 (1998) |
|
|
|
No significant differences between both groups in the tolerability profile
Headache, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, rhinitis and sinusitis were most commonly reported among patients
|
Franzese et al.25 (2002) |
|
|
|
|
Erbas et al.26 (1993) |
The following regimens were given for 3 weeks, then 3 weeks washout and 3 weeks cross-over:
Metoclopramide (10 mg orally, three times per day)
Erythromycin (250 mg orally, three times per day)
|
|
|
|
Ghrelin receptor agonist |
Murray et al.27 (2005) |
|
|
|
|
Ejskjaer et al.28 (2009) |
|
|
|
|
Ejskjaer et al.29 (2010) |
|
In the group receiving ulimorelin 80 μg/kg, the severity of GCSI loss of appetite and vomiting scores was significantly improved (P = 0.034 and 0.006, respectively)
The post-prandial fullness domain of the GSA score was significantly improved compared to placebo
|
|
|
Ejskjaer et al.32 (2013) |
|
|
|
|
McCallum et al.43 (2013) |
|
|
|
AEs occurred in 57%, 58% and 67% in the 10 mg, 20 mg and placebo groups, respectively without remarkable differences
|
Shin et al.38 (2013) |
|
|
|
|
Shin et al.40 (2013) |
|
Since it was a single-dose study, it was not powered to investigate DG
GCSI scores were similar in both groups.
|
Gastric T½ of solids, but not liquids, reduced by relamorelin versus placebo (P = 0.011)
Significant effects were noted also in GE at 2 and 4 hours (with percent differences of 48% and 19%, respectively)
|
|
Lembo et al.41 (2016) |
|
|
|
|
Camilleri et al.42 (2017) |
|
Relamorelin reduced the frequency of vomiting by 75% compared to baseline, but not compared to placebo
Different doses of relamorelin decreased all composite symptoms of DG compared to placebo (P <0.05)
|
|
|
Motilin receptor agonist |
Desautels et al.59 (1995) |
|
|
|
|
McCallum et al.21 (2007) |
|
No significant effects were noted over 12 weeks among groups
In a subset of the population under study (those having 75% positive weekly responses), mitemcinal 10 mg produced a significant improvement in total symptoms during the study period (P <0.05) compared to placebo
|
|
Severe AEs were reported in 18.8%, 15.9% and 20.0% of patients in the placebo, mitemcinal 5 mg, and mitemcinal 10 mg groups, respectively
There were non-significant differences among groups
|
Barton et al.66 (2014) |
|
|
|
|
Hellström et al.39 (2016) |
|
|
GEBT T½ decreased by 65% (P <0.05) by 125 mg camicinal compared to placebo
There was a non-significant trend of reduced GEBT T½ with 25 and 50 mg doses
A dose-response relationship was apparent
|
|
5-HT4 receptor agonist |
Braden et al.30 (2002) |
|
|
GEBT T½ decreased significantly in the INT group after 12 months compared to baseline (P = 0.03); the placebo group showed no changes from baseline
No effects were noted on glucose control in both groups
|
|
Lehmann et al.31 (2003) |
|
|
GE improved significantly at 120 min in the INT group (P = 0.025), while gastric T½ did not differ between the INT and placebo groups (P = 0.09)
No apparent improvements in glycaemic control
|
|