Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Jun 25;14(1):44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.06.008

Table 3.

Short-term outcomes – Comparison between four competing management strategies.

ROMICAT II CCTA* ROMICATI SOC* Expert Consensus* Expedited ED Protocol*
Length of Hospital Stay (hours) 23.4 30.6 30.9 12.3
Noninvasive Diagnostic testing
 CCTA (%) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
 SPECT (%) 8.8 29.8 22.1 8.2
 Stress ECHO (%) 1.3 20.6 28.4 10.5
 ETT (%) 1.2 32.5 29.0 10.8
Invasive Coronary Angiography (%) 16.1 11.3 14.1 6.6
Accuracy to detect obstructive CAD#
 True positive (%) 98.6 68.9 75.0 45.5
 False positive (%) 3.7 1.4 1.3 0.5
Coronary Revascularization
 PCI (%) 4.3 3.0 3.3 2.1
 CABG (%) 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.5
Cost of Care ($)
 Diagnostic costs (incl. angiography) 2,692 2,501 2,535 1,891
 Treatment costs 1,798 1,643 1,529 622
Total 4,490 4,144 4,064 2,513

CCTA = Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography; ECHO = Echocardiography; ETT = Exercise Tolerance Test; PCI = Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; SPECT = Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography.

*

The outcomes were based on a simulation of each strategy in 1000 patients from ROMICAT II trial, #estimated based on published diagnostic accuracy data for each test