Skip to main content
International Journal of Biological Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Biological Sciences
. 2020 Jan 1;16(1):38–48. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.34422

The Function of Pre-mRNA Alternative Splicing in Mammal Spermatogenesis

Huibin Song 1, Ling Wang 1, Dake Chen 1, Fenge Li 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6930371  PMID: 31892844

Abstract

Alternative pre-mRNA splicing plays important roles in co-transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression functioned during many developmental processes, such as spermatogenesis. The studies focusing on alternative splicing on spermatogenesis supported the notion that the development of testis is regulated by a higher level of alternative splicing than other tissues. Here, we aim to review the mechanisms underlying alternative splicing, particularly the splicing variants functioned in the process of spermatogenesis and the male infertility. There are five points regarding the alternative splicing including ⅰ) a brief introduction of alternative pre-mRNA splicing; ⅱ) the alternative splicing events in spermatogenesis-associated genes enriched in different stages of spermatogenesis; ⅲ) the mechanisms of alternative splicing regulation, such as splicing factors and m6A demethylation; ⅳ) the splice site recognition and alternative splicing, including the production and degradation of abnormal transcripts caused by gene variations and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, respectively; ⅴ) abnormal alternative splicing correlated with male infertility. Taking together, this review highlights the impacts of alternative splicing and splicing variants in mammal spermatogenesis and provides new insights of the potential application of the alternative splicing into the therapy of male infertility.

Keywords: Alternative splicing, Mammal spermatogenesis, Splicing factors, Male infertility

Introduction

Alternative splicing is one of the most popular co-transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that result in a large number of mRNA and protein isoforms from a single gene, and the protein isoforms always show different or mutually antagonistic functional and structural characteristics 1, 2. Recent high-throughput analyses have shown the abundance of alternative splicing events reaching > 95-100% in human genes and 63% in mouse genes 3, 4, and identified several modes of alternative transcript events, including exon-skipping (ES), intron-retention (IR), alternative 5' splice site (A5SS), alternative 3' splice site (A3SS), alternative first exon (AFE), alternative last exon (ALE) and mutually exclusive exon (MXE) 5. The exon skipping events are accumulated in the brain and testis, suggesting a tissue-specific nature of alternative splicing 6, 7.

The process of spermatogenesis occurs in the seminiferous tubules of testis. Asingle spermatogonia self-renew and form spermatogonial stem cells to ensure the maintenance of the stem cell pool, while Apaired spermatogonia usually differentiate into two B spermatogonia 8, 9. B spermatogonia come into the process of mitosis and proliferate into primary spermatocytes. Subsequently, primary spermatocytes divide twice during meiosis and form haploid round spermatids. In this phase, genetic material recombines mutually and the cells constantly split twice 10. Finally, round spermatids go through the process of spermiogenesis to form spermatozoa. In this phase, the morphological changes have taken place in spermatids, including the condensation of nucleus, the formation of acrosome and tail, the elimination of residual body and the transient appearance of manchette 11. The complicated physiological process requires specific genes to perform certain regulatory functions. Recently, high-throughput sequencing has revealed the importance of alternative splicing in the testis proteome diversification and spermatogenesis 5, 12-15. In this review, we will provide the functions of alternative splicing in spermatogenesis, clarify the mechanisms of alternative splicing in spermatogenesis, and explain the potential correlations between alternative splicing and male infertility.

Alternative splicing of key genes involved in spermatogenesis

Spermatogenesis is a highly complex process that initiates shortly after birth and continues until old age 16. The alternative splicing events are particularly prevalent in the testis, just less popular than in the brain. Spermatogenesis is an extremely complex and coordinated process, and the various genes are dynamically expressed in each type of spermatogenic cells. For better understanding the precision of gene regulation in spermatogenesis, we offer a series of alternative splicing events in the process of spermatogenesis.

GO analysis had identified 242 differently expressed genes enriched in spermatogenesis (GO: 0007283) in the testes from Large White pig at the age of 60 days (60-d) and 180 days (180-d) by RNA-seq 5. Several genes was identified with alternative splicing to generate different transcripts encoding numerous protein isoforms, such as Spata3 17, Spata19 18, Crem 19, 20, Dazl 21, Hsf1 22, Acrbp 23, Ybx3 24. Two members of SPATA family, Spata3, Spata19 can generate two splicing variants by exon skipping or alternative 3' splice site, respectively. Crem, a transcription factor regulated by cAMP controls the developmental progression of germ cells, and has ten splicing variants via several modes of alternative splicing. In postnatal testis developmental stages, the Dazl-Δ8 isoform is constantly expressed, along with Dazl-FL isoform. The information about spermatogenesis-enriched genes and their alternative splicing events are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

The information of genes enriched in spermatogenesis and their alternative splicing modes.

Gene name Species Ensembl
ID
Chromosome location Variants
number
Transcript
ID
Modes of alternative splicing Accession number Conventional transcript or
not
References
Spata3 Mouse ENSMUSG00000026226 1 2 ENSMUST00000052854 _ NM_027300 Yes 17
ENSMUST00000152501 Exon skipping NM_027029 No
Spata19 Mouse ENSMUSG00000031991 9 2 ENSMUST00000034473 _ NM_029299 Yes 18
ENSMUST00000214287 Alternative 3' splicing site NM_001305058 No
Crem Rat 19 ENSMUSG00000063889 18 10 ENSMUST00000025069 _ NM_001271506 Yes 19,20
Human 20 ENSMUST00000049942 Alternative first exon NM_001311067 No
ENSMUST00000082141 Exon skipping NM_001271505 No
ENSMUST00000122958 Alternative first exon NM_001110853 No
ENSMUST00000124747 Alternative first exon NM_001311066 No
ENSMUST00000130599 Alternative first exon, Exon skipping NM_001110857 No
ENSMUST00000137568 Alternative first exon, Exon skipping NM_001110850 No
ENSMUST00000142690 Alternative last exon NM_001110851 No
ENSMUST00000146265 Exon skipping NM_001271503 No
ENSMUST00000149803 Alternative 3' splicing site NM_001110852 No
Dazl Mouse ENSMUSG00000010592 17 2 _ _ NM_010021 Yes 21
ENSMUST00000010736 Exon skipping NM_001277863 No
Hsf1 Mouse ENSMUSG00000022556 15 4 ENSMUST00000072838 _ NM_008296 Yes 22
ENSMUST00000226872 Alternative 3' splicing site NM_001331214 No
ENSMUST00000227478 Alternative 3' splicing site NM_001331154 No
ENSMUST00000228371 Exon skipping NM_001331153 No
Acrbp Mouse ENSMUSG00000072770 6 2 ENSMUST00000088294 _ NM_016845 Yes 23
ENSMUST00000112414 Alternative 3' splicing site NM_001127340 No
Ybx3 Mouse ENSMUSG00000030189 6 2 ENSMUST00000032309 _ NM_139117 Yes 24
ENSMUST00000087865 Exon skipping NM_011733 No

Note:'_'means that there is no information.

Many germ cell-specific transcripts are developmentally regulated and stage specific 25. C-kit, proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase, plays an indispensable role in the differentiation of spermatogonial cells 26. A truncated form tr-kit is specifically expressed in spermatids and spermatozoa, and acts as a putative sperm factor required for triggering activation of mouse eggs at fertilization 26, 27. Synaptonemal complex protein 3 (Sycp3), specifically localized in spermatocytes, is necessary for male meiosis and spermatogenesis 28, 29. In our previous study, an A3SS transcript and a retained intron transcript of Sycp3 gene were identified in the testes from 60-d and 180-d Large White pigs 5. Disrupted meiotic cDNA1 (Dmc1) is required for double-strand break repair and plays a pivotal role during meiotic homologous recombination 30. An exon skipped transcript Dmc1-d is expressed in both male and female germ cells, which indicates a novel role in meiosis 31. A-kinase anchoring protein 4 (Akap4) is transcribed only in the post-meiotic phase of spermatogenesis and Akap4 knockout mice exhibit defects in sperm flagellum and motility 32. Akap82 and Fsc1 belonging to Akap4 alternative splicing variants are different in 5' UTR, and therefore encode the identical proteins, but Akap82 transcript is more abundantly expressed in spermatids than Fsc1 transcript (Figure 1) 33.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The critical genes and their alternative splicing transcripts in the first wave of spermatogenesis. C-kit is the marker of differentiated spermatogonial cells. Two transcripts, full length transcript and the exon skipped transcript were detected in mouse testis 26, 27. Sycp3 and Dmc1 are the markers of spermatocytes. The A3SS transcript and retained intron transcript of Sycp3 were identified in the testes from 60-d and 180-d Large White pigs 5. The exon skipped Dmc1-d transcript was expressed in both male and female germ cells 31. Akap4 is the marker of spermatids. Two Akap4 alternative splicing variants - Akap82 and Fsc1 were different in their 5' UTR 33.

Sperm-associated antigen families are the proteins that highly expressed in the testis and are essential for motile cilia and flagella 34. Previous studies have indicated that alternative splicing of sperm-associated antigen genes play important roles in spermatogenesis 5, 35-40. Three isoforms of human Spag11b including Spag11b-a, Spag11b-d and Spag11b-g were different in their 3D fold structure 35. Spag11b-d isoform could interact with tryptase alpha/beta 1 (Tpsab1), tetraspanin 7 (Tspan7), and attractin (Atrn), and then played major roles in immunity and fertility 36. Two Spag11 transcripts including Spag11c and the exon-skipped transcript Spag11t were detected in rat 37. Spag11c was expressed in epididymis and testis, while Spag11t was only confined to the caput region in the epididymis and was absent from testis and seminal vesicle 37. Spag16 is the homologous to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii PF20 and is associated with the axonemal central apparatus 38. In human testis, the long Spag16 isoform was localized to the central microtubule of the sperm, whereas the short isoform was located around the nucleus of spermatogenic cells in the late stage of meiosis 39, 40. RNA-sequencing of immature and mature porcine testes identified several alternative splicing events of Spag6 gene 5. Overall, the alternative splicing events of sperm-associated antigen family are spatio-temporal expressed, which illustrate the crucial role in spermatogenesis.

The mechanisms of alternative splicing regulation

Eukaryotic genes are composed of short exons and long introns. A majority of pre-mRNAs exist constitutive splicing and alternative splicing. Both types of splicing follow the “GT-AG” rule and are regulated by cis-acting splicing regulatory elements (SRE) and trans-acting splicing factors. The SREs consist of exonic splicing enhancers and silencers (ESE and ESS), intronic splicing enhancers and silencers (ISE and ISS) 41, 42. The trans-acting factors are some RNA binding proteins such as the serine/arginine-rich (SR) proteins and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) family. SR proteins usually promote pre-mRNA splicing by binding ESE or ISE sequences via the N-terminal RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) or by interacting with other proteins via the C-terminal arginine-and serine-rich domain (RS), while hnRNP family usually inhibits pre-mRNA splicing by binding ESS or ISS sequences via their RRMs 43. Generally, SR and hnRNP proteins have the opposite function in RNA splicing. However, the recent study in Drosophila indicates that SR and hnRNP proteins tend to act coordinately but not antagonistically 44.

RNA binding proteins can act as splicing enhancers or repressors, depending on which region of a skipped exon they bind to 45, 46. Recent researches have revealed the critical role of RNA binding proteins in mammal spermatogenesis 47-50. The polypyrimidine tract binding protein 2 (Ptbp2) is a strong regulator of alternative splicing 48, 52, 53. In mammal spermatogenesis, Ptbp2 binds 3'SS of the cassette exons in critical genes, inhibits the exon skipping and then regulates alternative splicing in a stage-specific manner 48, 51. Furthermore, numerous mis-spliced isoforms in those genes that are essential for Sertoli cell cytoskeleton and germ cell-Sertoli cell crosstalk appeared in Ptbp2-deficient mouse testis 48. Dazap1 is a ubiquitous hnRNP protein that is expressed most abundantly in the testis and knock down of Dazap1 in 293T cells exhibits alternative splicing changes in those genes involved in cell cycle, DNA replication, transcriptional control and metabolism 49. Another study revealed that a missense mutation (R263P) in the second RRM of RNA binding motif protein 5 (Rbm5) affected pre-mRNA splicing, produced aberrantly spliced transcripts and displayed spermatid differentiation arrest, azoospermia and male sterility 50.

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a kind of the most abundant modifications in messenger RNAs and plays a pivotal role in regulating alternative splicing and RNA degradation 54. RNA m6A methylation is a dynamic and reversible modification that mediated by m6A “writers”, “erasers” and “readers” 55-61. m6A “writers” mainly consist of methyltransferases like 3 and 14 (Mettl3 and Mettl14), WT1 associated protein (Wtap) and vir like m6A methyltransferase associated (Virma) 55-57. While alpha-ketoglutarate dependent dioxygenase (Fto) and alkB homolog 5 (Alkbh5) as demethylases (m6A “erasers”) can reverse the m6A methylation 58, 59. And currently, m6A “readers” have been found including the binding proteins family such as heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein family and YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding proteins 60, 61.

More and more researches show m6A modification plays a critical role in mRNA alternative splicing and stability in mammal spermatogenesis 59, 62. m6A methyltransferase Mettl3 knockout mouse shows the defects in spermatogonial differentiation and meiosis, with a lower exon inclusion level in those transcripts containing m6A and alternative splicing in several critical genes involved in spermatogenesis including Dazl, Sohlh1, Nasp and Cdk11b 63. During late spermiogenesis, the increased production of transcripts with shorter 3'-UTRs allows for an efficient translation and a quick mRNA/protein turnover 64. m6A demethylase Alkbh5 is required for the late meiotic and haploid phases of spermatogenesis 65. In spermatocytes and round spermatids, Alkbh5 tends to mark the coding sequences and 3'-UTRs of longer mRNAs that are destined to be degraded and controls correct splicing of long 3'-UTR transcripts (Figure 2) 66, 67.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

m6A modification plays a critical role in mRNA alternative splicing and stability in mammal spermatogenesis. m6A methyltransferase Mettl3 is essential for spermatogonial differentiation and meiosis during mouse spermatogenesis. m6A modification that mediated by Mettl3 ensures exons containing m6A sites have the correct exon inclusion levels 63. m6A demethylase Alkbh5 is required for the late meiotic and spermiogenesis during spermatogenesis 65. m6A tends to mark the 3'-UTRs of longer mRNAs that are destined to be degraded and Alkbh5 controls correct splicing of exon and 3'-UTR which have m6A sites 66, 67.

The splice site recognition and alternative splicing

The pre-mRNA splicing is originated by spliceosomes that bind to sequences located at the 5' and 3' ends of introns 68. Spliceosome assembly comprises five types of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs). U1 snRNP binds to the 5' GU. U2 snRNP and splicing factor 1 (SF1) bind to the branch site under the assistance of the mRNA splicing factor U2 associated factor (U2AF) and form the splicing complex precursor (A complex) 69. U4-U5-U6 snRNP trimer forms the splicing complex (B complex) through interactions between RNA-RNA (SR protein) and RNA-protein (hnRNP) 1. Subsequently, 5' end of the intron is cleaved from the upstream exon and joined to the branch site by a 2', 5'-phosphodiester linkage. The 3' end of the intron is cleaved from the downstream exon, and the two exons are joined by a phosphodiester bond 41. The intron is then released in lariat form and degraded 70 (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The composition of the spliceosome complex and the pre-mRNA splicing process. U1 snRNP binds to the 5' GU. U2 snRNP and SF1 bind to the branch site under the assistance of the mRNA splicing factor U2 associated factor (U2AF65 and U2AF35) and form the splicing complex precursor (A complex) 69. U4-U5-U6 snRNP trimer forms the splicing complex (B complex) through interactions between RNA-RNA (SR proteins) that bind to ISE and RNA-proteins (hnRNP) that bind to ISS. The 5' end and 3' end of the intron are cleaved from the upstream and downstream exons by a 2', 5'-phosphodiester linkage, and therefore exons are connected together.

Alternative splicing always comes with the emergence of the improper splice site recognition, which is always influenced by genetic variants or abnormal expression of splicing factors 41. For example, an exonic SNP (c.2851G>T) in sperm flagellar 2 (Spef2) is associated with semen deformity rate and post-thaw cryopreserved sperm motility in Holstein bulls, potentially leads to the production of Spef2-SV3 transcript which is only detected in testis and epididymis 71. Inner centromere protein (Incenp) is involved in cell division and sister chromatid separation as the main member of chromosomal passenger protein complex and a mutation (g.19970A>G) in its intron 11 results in exon 12 skipping and creates several novel binding sites for the splicing factors SRSF1, SRSF5, and SRSF6 72. The SR proteins, such as SRp38 and 9G8, are highly expressed in germ cells 73, 74. The SNPs in these SR proteins are significantly associated with the risk of non-obstructive azoospermia in Chinese men, which provides more evidence for the role of splicing activity in human spermatogenesis 75. A SNP in exonuclease 1 (Exo1) intron 8 potentially results in the production of truncated forms-tr1-Exo1 and tr2-Exo1, which partly explains metaphase-specific apoptosis in MRL/MpJ mice 76. Zrsr1 is a U2AF35-like splicing factor which recognizes the 3' splice site during spliceosome assembly, and the Zrsr1 mutant mice containing truncating mutations within its RRM exhibits the abundant intron retention events in genes associated with spermatogenesis, and germ cell apoptosis, azoospermia and male sterility 77. The conditional deficiency of another pre-mRNA splicing factor breast cancer amplified sequence 2 (Bcas2) in male germ cells results in male infertility and aberrant splicing of Dazl, Ehmt2 and Hmga1 genes 78.

Alternative splicing coupled to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) is an efficient strategy to regulate gene expression. The main feature of NMD is that the last exon generates a premature termination codon (PTC) producing a transcript with a C-terminally truncated polypeptide. NMD pathway is a post-transcriptional RNA surveillance mechanism that rapidly degrades the toxic truncated protein, preventing it from damaging cells 79, 80. Up-frameshift mutant (UPF) and suppressor with morphological effect on genitalia (SMG) family are important factors in NMD pathway. Upf1 recognizes abnormal translation termination and then interacts with Upf2 and Upf3 81. Upf1 phosphorylation is mediated by Smg1. Protein phosphatase 2A, Pp2a interacts with Smg5, Smg6 and Smg7, and then promotes Upf1 de-phosphorylation. Smg5 and Smg6 identify PTCs by their special domains and degrade mRNAs (Figure 4) 82-84. The mRNAs that contain PTCs or long 3' UTRs could be the potential substrates of NMD 85. Emerging evidence provide an indispensable role of NMD in spermatogenesis. Inactivation of Upf2, a component of the chromatoid body, causes azoospermia and male sterility. In Upf2-null mouse spermatocytes and round spermatids, the long 3' UTR transcripts from ubiquitously expressed genes are abundantly accumulated and trigger nonsense-mediated mRNA decay 86. Tudor domain containing 6 (Tdrd6) is essential for Upf1-Upf2 interaction. The long 3' UTR-stimulated NMD is impaired in Tdrd6-/- spermatids by interfering with Upf1-mRNA binding, thus perturbing mRNA processing 87.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Mechanistic model underlying nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Upf1 interacts with Upf2, Upf3 and then undergoes Smg1-mediated phosphorylation. Pp2a interacts with Smg5, Smg6 and Smg7 and promotes Upf1 de-phosphorylation. Smg5 and Smg6 identify PTC; Smg7 degrade mRNA 5'cap structure and phosphorylated-Upf1 degrades mRNAs 81-84.

Alternative splicing and male infertility

Spermatogenesis is a continuous hormone-dependent cell proliferation and differentiation process. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteotropic hormone (LH) can induce the secretion of testosterone that is important for spermatogenesis 88. In addition, FSH and LH are also essential for the initiation and maintenance of normal spermatogenesis 89. Multiple studies have found that alternative splicing of hormone receptor genes influences male infertility 93-96. For example, a homozygous G>A mutation in intron 10-exon 11 boundary of LHR gene results in skipping of partial exon 11. The male patient appears delayed puberty, micropenis and oligospermia, and two of his sisters are infertile 90. Several splicing variants in FSHR gene are identified in infertile patients, including the exon 9 skipped variant which leads to the removal of two highly conserved cysteine residues at positions 275 and 276 91, 92. Another study reveals several FSHR splicing variants lack of exon 2, exon 2 and 5, exon 5 and 6, exon 2, 5 and 6 in mouse testis 93. The exon 5 and 6 skipped transcript produces a mutant receptor that can't bind to FSH and then leads to male infertility.

Previous studies showed that Sertoli-cell specific androgen receptor (AR) knockout mouse exhibited spermatogenic arrest and male infertile, suggesting the indispensable role of AR in spermatogenesis 94-97. Human AR protein consists of four functional domains: N-terminal transactivation domain (NTD) encoded by exon 1; DNA-binding domain (DBD) encoded by exon 2 and 3; Hinge domain encoded by exon 4 and ligand-binding domain (LBD) encoded by exon 5-8 98. Several mutations in AR gene splice sites are closely associated with androgen insensitivity syndrome 99-102. The c.1769-1G>A mutation in intron 2 splice acceptor site of AR gene results in an insertion of 69 nucleotides, which creates an insertion of 23 amino acids 99. The insertion that located between the two zinc fingers of the AR DBD domain impairs the specific contact from AR and its hormone response element 100. A c.2449+5 G>T mutation in intron 6 boundary splice donor site prevents the normal splicing of intron 6 and gives rise to a truncated protein that contains a PTC in retained intron 6. The truncated protein lacks part of C-terminal ligand-binding domain, and the truncated transcript is highly expressed in an 11-year-old girl, which probably explains the partial androgen insensitivity syndrome 101. A synonymous mutation (C>T) in exon 8 is identified in a patient with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome 102. The mutation produces an aberrant splicing variant that leads to partial skipping of exon 8 and a shortened 3'-untranslated region and the androgen-induced transcriptional activity is inhibited (Figure 5). Overall, aberrant alternative splicing of hormone receptor genes is closely associated with spermatogenesis and male infertility.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The mutations in AR gene splice sites result in aberrant splicing which are closely associated with human androgen insensitivity syndrome. Boxes represent exons of human AR gene. Exon 1 encodes N-terminal transactivation domain (NTD); Exon 2 and 3 encode the first and second zinc fingers of DNA-binding domain (DBD); Exon 4 encodes the hinge region; Exon 5-8 encode the COOH-terminal domain (CTD). Several mutations in AR gene splice sites result in aberrant splicing in androgen insensitivity syndrome patients. For example, the c.1769-1G>A mutation in intron 2 splice acceptor site results in an insertion of 69 nucleotides. The insertion between the two zinc fingers of the AR DNA binding domain (DBD domain) impairs the specific binding of AR response elements to AR 99, 100. A c.2449+5G>T mutation in intron 6 boundary splice donor site gives rise to a truncated protein that lacks part of C-terminal ligand-binding domain 101. A c2667C>T mutation in exon 8 produces an aberrant splicing variant that leads to partial skipping of exon 8 and a shortened 3'-untranslated region and the androgen-induced transcriptional activity is inhibited 102.

Summary and prospects

We have summarized the current knowledge regarding genes that regulate alternative splicing in spermatogenesis and also investigated the relationships between alternative splicing and male infertility (Figure 6). Spermatogenesis is a strictly regulated process, at both the transcriptional and the post-transcriptional level. Understanding the alternative splicing in spermatogenesis will be helpful to improve the sperm quality and cure male infertility.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Pre-mRNA splicing in mammal spermatogenesis and male infertility. In normal condition, pre-mRNA undergoes constitutive splicing, removes introns and joins adjacent exons. m6A modification maintains correct exon inclusion levels and plays a critical role in mammal spermatogenesis 62-67. Alternative splicing often comes into being along with the emergence of the abnormal splice site recognition. On the one hand, alternative splicing generates abnormal transcripts with a premature termination codon (PTC), which are degraded by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) 65, 86, 87. On the other hand, the mutations in splice sites result in the production of exon-skipped transcripts which are closely associated with male infertility 75, 76, 99-102.

It's well known that germ cells differentiate into spermatozoa, and transmit genetic and epigenetic information across generations 103. This review provides a large amount of information about alternative splicing events in germ cells of the genes critical for spermatogenesis. However, testis is a highly complex tissue which contains Leydig cells, Sertoli cells, germ cells and peritubular myoid cells. These cells cooperate with each other and ensure normal spermatogenesis. The Sertoli cells are essential for creating a microenvironment that enables to produce the functional spermatozoa. The communication between Sertoli-Sertoli cell and Sertoli-germ cell constitutes ectoplasmic specialization and blood-testis barrier (BTB) which protect germ cells from immunological attack and provide nutrients for germ cells 104. In addition, Leydig cells that between seminiferous tubules produce growth factors and secrete testosterone. A previous study has shown that LHR plays a key role in testosterone production and eight splicing variants of LHR gene are detected in bovine Leydig cells 105. The androgenic stimulation of peritubular myoid cells around seminiferous tubules is also essential for normal germ cell development 106. However, the functions of alternative splicing patterns of critical genes in Sertoli cells, Leydig cells and peritubular myoid cells are worth being explored.

Recently, there have been many researches on non-coding RNAs in spermatogenesis. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), unlike miRNAs and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), are a novel type of non-coding RNAs originated from introns, intergenic regions, untranslated regions and exhibit distinct patterns of alternative back-splicing and alternative splicing 107, 108. The roles of circRNAs in self-renewal and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells and sperm motility are gradually being studied 109-112. However, the relationships between alternative splicing that involved by circRNAs and spermatogenesis was seldom reported and needed further study.

High-throughput sequencing of short cDNA fragments (RNA-seq) generates tens of thousands alternative splicing events in numerous tissues. Meanwhile, the identification of important alternative splicing transcripts has become an urgent issue. There are two commonly used methods to estimate alternative splicing events at present. One is percent spliced in (PSI), proposed by Wang et al 113. ΔPSI is used to detect differential alternative splicing events in two samples of RNA-seq data. When ΔPSI ≥ 10%, the changes of splicing events in different samples are considered important 114. The other popular method to recognize alternative splicing is alternative splicing detector (ASD), which detects differential alternative splicing exons in different samples of RNA-seq data 115. This software considers the altered junction reads and altered coverage of AS-exons while calculating a P value. When P < 0.05, the AS event is statistically significant. Currently, both methods have been widely applied in numerous tissues 116-118, but scarcely in the testis. Therefore, the important alternative splicing events in the development of spermatogenesis deserve further excavation and investigation. In general, this study reviews some progresses in alternative splicing of spermatogenesis and also provides new ideas in the therapy of male infertility.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Chunyan Mou (Huazhong Agricultural University) for her efforts in revising this manuscript. This work was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772561, 31572362), The Trans-gene Key Project of China (2018ZX08009-27B), The Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2018CFA015) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662018PY037, 2662019PY017).

Author contributions

H.S. and F.L. planned and wrote the manuscript. L.W. and D.C. helped with the planning and writing.

Abbreviations

ES

exon-skipping

IR

intron-retention

A5SS

alternative 5' splice site

A3SS

alternative 3' splice site

AFE

alternative first exon

ALE

alternative last exon

MXE

mutually exclusive exon

SRE

splicing regulatory elements

ESE

exonic splicing enhancers

ESS

exonic splicing silencers

ISE

intronic splicing enhancers

ISS

intronic splicing silencers

SR

serine/arginine-rich

hnRNP

heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein

m6A

N6-methyladenosine

snRNPs

small nuclear ribonucleoproteins

NMD

nonsense-mediated mRNA decay

PTC

premature termination codon

UPF

Up-frameshift

FSH

follicle-stimulating hormone

LH

luteotropic hormone

AR

androgen receptor

NTD

N-terminal transactivation domain

DBD

DNA-binding domain

LBD

ligand-binding domain

BTB

blood-testis barrier

circRNAs

circular RNAs

PSI

percent spliced in

ASD

alternative splicing detector

References

  • 1.Lee Y, Rio DC. Mechanisms and regulation of alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84:291–323. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nilsen TW, Graveley BR. Expansion of the eukaryotic proteome by alternative splicing. Nature. 2010;463:457–63. doi: 10.1038/nature08909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Merkin J, Russell C, Chen P. et al. Evolutionary dynamics of gene and isoform regulation in Mammalian tissues. Science. 2012;338:1593–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1228186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pan Q, Shai O, Lee LJ. et al. Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by high-throughput sequencing. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1413–5. doi: 10.1038/ng.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Song H, Zhu L, Li Y. et al. Exploiting RNA-sequencing data from the porcine testes to identify the key genes involved in spermatogenesis in Large White pigs. Gene. 2015;573:303–9. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.07.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schmid R, Grellscheid SN, Ehrmann I. et al. The splicing landscape is globally reprogrammed during male meiosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:10170–84. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yeo G, Holste D, Kreiman G. et al. Variation in alternative splicing across human tissues. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R74. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jan SZ, Hamer G, Repping S. et al. Molecular control of rodent spermatogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822:1838–50. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aponte PM, van Bragt MP, de Rooij DG. et al. Spermatogonial stem cells: characteristics and experimental possibilities. APMIS. 2005;113:727–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2005.apm_302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Handel MA, Schimenti JC. Genetics of mammalian meiosis: regulation, dynamics and impact on fertility. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:124–36. doi: 10.1038/nrg2723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.O'Donnell L, Nicholls PK, O'Bryan MK. et al. Spermiation: The process of sperm release. Spermatogenesis. 2011;1:14–35. doi: 10.4161/spmg.1.1.14525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Margolin G, Khil PP, Kim J. et al. Integrated transcriptome analysis of mouse spermatogenesis. BMC Genomics. 2014;18:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zuo H, Zhang J, Zhang L. et al. Transcriptomic variation during spermiogenesis in mouse germ cells. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang J, Zhang Z, Zhang Y. et al. CLOCK interacts with RANBP9 and is involved in alternative splicing in spermatogenesis. Gene. 2018;5:199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ding H, Luo Y, Liu M. et al. Histological and transcriptome analyses of testes from Duroc and Meishan boars. Sci Rep. 2016;11:20758. doi: 10.1038/srep20758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kopera IA, Bilinska B, Cheng CY. et al. Sertoli-germ cell junctions in the testis: a review of recent data. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365:1593–605. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li L, Liu G, Fu JJ. et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel transcript variant of Mtsarg1 gene. Mol Biol Rep. 2009;36:1023–32. doi: 10.1007/s11033-008-9276-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nourashrafeddin S, Ebrahimzadeh-Vesal R, Modarressi MH. et al. Identification of Spata-19 new variant with expression beyond meiotic phase of mouse testis development. Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;2:89–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Walker WH, Sanborn BM, Habener JF. An isoform of transcription factor CREM expressed during spermatogenesis lacks the phosphorylation domain and represses cAMP-induced transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:12423–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Guo Q. Cyclic AMP-responsive element modulator α polymorphisms are potential genetic risks for systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:906086. doi: 10.1155/2015/906086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xu X, Tan X, Lin Q. et al. Mouse Dazl and its novel splice variant functions in translational repression of target mRNAs in embryonic stem cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1829:425–35. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Neueder A, Achilli F, Moussaoui S. et al. Novel isoforms of heat shock transcription factor 1, HSF1γα and HSF1γβ, regulate chaperone protein gene transcription. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:19894–906. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.570739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kanemori Y, Ryu JH, Sudo M. et al. Two functional forms of ACRBP/sp32 are produced by pre-mRNA alternative splicing in the mouse. Biol Reprod. 2013;88:105. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.107425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Uchibe K, Shimizu H, Yokoyama S. et al. Identification of novel transcription-regulating genes expressed during murine molar development. Dev Dyn. 2012;241:1217–26. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.23808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eddy EM. Male germ cell gene expression. Recent Prog Horm Res. 2002;57:103–28. doi: 10.1210/rp.57.1.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sette C, Dolci S, Geremia R. et al. The role of stem cell factor and of alternative c-kit gene products in the establishment, maintenance and function of germ cells. Int J Dev Biol. 2000;44:599–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sette C, Bevilacqua A, Bianchini A. et al. Parthenogenetic activation of mouse eggs by microinjection of a truncated c-kit tyrosine kinase present in spermatozoa. Development. 1997;124:2267–74. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.11.2267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang S, Pan Z, Zhang Q. et al. Differential mRNA expression and promoter methylation status of SYCP3 gene in testes of yaks and cattle-yaks. Reprod Domest Anim. 2012;47:455–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01902.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ozaki Y, Saito K, Shinya M. et al. Evaluation of Sycp3, Plzf and Cyclin B3 expression and suitability as spermatogonia and spermatocyte markers in zebrafish. Gene Expr Patterns. 2011;11:309–15. doi: 10.1016/j.gep.2011.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ahlawat S, Chopra M, Jaiswal L. et al. Exon skipping creates novel splice variants of DMC1 gene in ruminants. Mol Cell Probes. 2016;30:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2016.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Habu T, Taki T, West A. et al. The mouse and human homologs of DMC1, the yeast meiosis-specific homologous recombination gene, have a common unique form of exon-skipped transcript in meiosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:470–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.3.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Miki K, Willis WD, Brown PR. et al. Targeted disruption of the Akap4 gene causes defects in sperm flagellum and motility. Dev Biol. 2002;248:331–42. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nipper RW, Chennothukuzhi V, Tutuncu L. et al. Differential RNA expression and polyribosome loading of alternative transcripts of the Akap4 gene in murine spermatids. Mol Reprod Dev. 2005;70:397–405. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nagarkatti-Gude DR, Jaimez R, Henderson SC. et al. Spag16, an axonemal central apparatus gene, encodes a male germ cell nuclear speckle protein that regulates SPAG16 mRNA expression. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Narmadha G, Yenugu S. Molecular modeling of the human sperm associated antigen 11 B (SPAG11B) proteins. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2015;61:78–88. doi: 10.3109/19396368.2014.1002139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Radhakrishnan Y, Hamil KG, Tan JA. et al. Novel partners of SPAG11B isoform D in the human male reproductive tract. Biol Reprod. 2009;81:647–56. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.109.077545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yenugu S, Hamil KG, Grossman G. et al. Identification, cloning and functional characterization of novel sperm associated antigen 11 (SPAG11) isoforms in the rat. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;28:23. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-4-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Alciaturi J, Anesetti G, Irigoin F. et al. Distribution of sperm antigen 6 (SPAG6) and 16 (SPAG16) in mouse ciliated and non-ciliated tissues. J Mol Histol. 2019;50:189–202. doi: 10.1007/s10735-019-09817-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang Z, Shen X, Gude DR. et al. MEIG1 is essential for spermiogenesis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17055–60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906414106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang Z, Kostetskii I, Tang W. et al. Deficiency of SPAG16L causes male infertility associated with impaired sperm motility. Biol Reprod. 2006;74:751–9. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.049254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li Y, Yuan Y. Alternative RNA splicing and gastric cancer. Mutat Res. 2017;773:263–73. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kelemen O, Convertini P, Zhang Z. et al. Function of alternative splicing. Gene. 2013;514:1–30. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.07.083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lunde BM, Moore C, Varani G. RNA-binding proteins: modular design for efficient function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:479–90. doi: 10.1038/nrm2178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Brooks AN, Duff MO, May G. et al. Regulation of alternative splicing in Drosophila by 56 RNA binding proteins. Genome Res. 2015;25:1771–80. doi: 10.1101/gr.192518.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.König J, Zarnack K, Luscombe NM. et al. Protein-RNA interactions: new genomic technologies and perspectives. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:77–83. doi: 10.1038/nrg3141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fu XD, Ares M Jr. Context-dependent control of alternative splicing by RNA-binding proteins. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:689–701. doi: 10.1038/nrg3778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Paronetto MP, Sette C. Role of RNA-binding proteins in mammalian spermatogenesis. Int J Androl. 2010;33:2–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00959.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hannigan MM, Zagore LL, Licatalosi DD. Ptbp2 controls an alternative splicing network required for cell communication during spermatogenesis. Cell Rep. 2017;19:2598–612. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Choudhury R, Roy SG, Tsai YS. et al. The splicing activator DAZAP1 integrates splicing control into MEK/Erk-regulated cell proliferation and migration. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3078. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.O'Bryan MK, Clark BJ, McLaughlin EA. et al. RBM5 is a male germ cell splicing factor and is required for spermatid differentiation and male fertility. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Boutz PL, Stoilov P, Li Q. et al. A post-transcriptional regulatory switch in polypyrimidine tract-binding proteins reprograms alternative splicing in developing neurons. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1636–52. doi: 10.1101/gad.1558107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Licatalosi DD, Yano M, Fak JJ. et al. Ptbp2 represses adult-specific splicing to regulate the generation of neuronal precursors in the embryonic brain. Genes Dev. 2012;26:1626–42. doi: 10.1101/gad.191338.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xu M, Hecht NB. Polypyrimidine tract binding protein 2 stabilizes phosphoglycerate kinase 2 mRNA in murine male germ cells by binding to its 3'UTR. Biol Reprod. 2007;76:1025–33. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.060079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cao G, Li HB, Yin Z. et al. Recent advances in dynamic m6A RNA modification. Open Biol. 2016;6:160003. doi: 10.1098/rsob.160003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ping XL, Sun BF, Wang L. et al. Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase. Cell Res. 2014;24:177–89. doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang Y, Li Y, Toth JI. et al. N6-methyladenosine modification destabilizes developmental regulators in embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:191–8. doi: 10.1038/ncb2902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Schwartz S, Mumbach MR, Jovanovic M. et al. Perturbation of m6A writers reveals two distinct classes of mRNA methylation at internal and 5' sites. Cell Rep. 2014;8:284–96. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.05.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jia G, Fu Y, Zhao X. et al. N6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:885–7. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zheng G, Dahl JA, Niu Y. et al. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol Cell. 2013;49:18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Liu N, Dai Q, Zheng G. et al. N(6)-methyladenosine-dependent RNA structural switches regulate RNA-protein interactions. Nature. 2015;518:560–4. doi: 10.1038/nature14234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang X, Lu Z, Gomez A. et al. N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature. 2014;505:117–20. doi: 10.1038/nature12730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lin Z, Hsu PJ, Xing X. et al. Mettl3-/Mettl14-mediated mRNA N6-methyladenosine modulates murine spermatogenesis. Cell Res. 2017;27:1216–30. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Xu K, Yang Y, Feng GH. et al. Mettl3-mediated m6A regulates spermatogonial differentiation and meiosis initiation. Cell Res. 2017;27:1100–14. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhang Y, Tang C, Yu T. et al. MicroRNAs control mRNA fate by compartmentalization based on 3' UTR length in male germ cells. Genome Biol. 2017;18:105. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1243-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zheng G, Dahl JA, Niu Y. et al. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol Cell. 2013;49:18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bao J, Vitting-Seerup K, Waage J. et al. UPF2-dependent nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway is essential for spermatogenesis by selectively eliminating longer 3'UTR transcripts. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1005863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tang C, Klukovich R, Peng H. et al. ALKBH5-dependent m6A demethylation controls splicing and stability of long 3'-UTR mRNAs in male germ cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E325–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717794115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hoskins AA, Friedman LJ, Gallagher SS. et al. Ordered and dynamic assembly of single spliceosomes. Science. 2011;331:1289–95. doi: 10.1126/science.1198830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Fox-Walsh KL, Dou Y, Lam BJ. et al. The architecture of pre-mRNAs affects mechanisms of splice-site pairing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16176–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508489102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Matlin AJ, Clark F, Smith CW. Understanding alternative splicing: towards a cellular code. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:386–98. doi: 10.1038/nrm1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Guo F, Yang B, Ju ZH. et al. Alternative splicing, promoter methylation, and functional SNPs of sperm flagella 2 gene in testis and mature spermatozoa of Holstein bulls. Reproduction. 2013;147:241–52. doi: 10.1530/REP-13-0343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Liu J, Sun Y, Yang C. et al. Functional SNPs of INCENP affect semen quality by alternative splicing mode and binding affinity with the target Bta-miR-378 in Chinese Holstein bulls. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0162730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Xiao PJ, Hu L, Li J. et al. NSSR1 is regulated in testes development and cryptorchidism and promotes the exon 5-included splicing of CREB transcripts. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007;74:1363–72. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Dreumont N, Bourgeois CF, Lejeune F. et al. Human RBMY regulates germline-specific splicing events by modulating the function of the serine/arginine-rich proteins 9G8 and Tra2-b. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:40–50. doi: 10.1242/jcs.055889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ni B, Ma H, Lin Y. et al. Genetic variants in Ser-Arg protein-coding genes are associated with the risk of nonobstructive azoospermia in Chinese men. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1711–7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Namiki Y, Endoh D, Kon Y. Genetic mutation associated with meiotic metaphase-specific apoptosis in MRL/MpJ mice. Mol Reprod Dev. 2003;64:179–88. doi: 10.1002/mrd.10208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Horiuchi K, Perez-Cerezales S, Papasaikas P. et al. Impaired spermatogenesis, muscle, and erythrocyte function in U12 intron splicing-defective Zrsr1 mutant mice. Cell Rep. 2018;23:143–55. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Liu W, Wang F, Xu Q. et al. BCAS2 is involved in alternative mRNA splicing in spermatogonia and the transition to meiosis. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14182. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lewis BP, Green RE, Brenner SE. Evidence for the widespread coupling of alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:189–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0136770100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tabrez SS, Sharma RD, Jain V. et al. Differential alternative splicing coupled to nonsense-mediated decay of mRNA ensures dietary restriction-induced longevity. Nat Commun. 2017;8:306. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00370-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hilleren P, Parker R. mRNA surveillance in eukaryotes: kinetic proofreading of proper translation termination as assessed by mRNP domain organization? RNA. 1999;5:711–9. doi: 10.1017/s1355838299990519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chakrabarti S, Bonneau F, Schüssler S. et al. Phospho-dependent and phospho-independent interactions of the helicase UPF1 with the NMD factors SMG5-SMG7 and SMG6. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:9447–60. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kurosaki T, Li W, Hoque M. et al. A post-translational regulatory switch on UPF1 controls targeted mRNA degradation. Genes Dev. 2014;28:1900–16. doi: 10.1101/gad.245506.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ohnishi T, Yamashita A, Kashima I. et al. Phosphorylation of hUPF1 induces formation of mRNA surveillance complexes containing hSMG-5 and hSMG-7. Mol Cell. 2003;12:1187–200. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00443-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Maquat LE. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Curr Biol. 2002;12:R196–7. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00747-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mühlemann O. Spermatogenesis studies reveal a distinct nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) mechanism for mRNAs with long 3'UTRs. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1005979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Fanourgakis G, Lesche M, Akpinar M. et al. Chromatoid body protein TDRD6 supports long 3' UTR triggered nonsense mediated mRNA decay. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1005857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wang C, Swerdloff RS. Male contraception. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;16:193–203. doi: 10.1053/beog.2001.0270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.O'Shaughnessy PJ. Hormonal control of germ cell development and spermatogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;29:55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bruysters M, Christin-Maitre S, Verhoef-Post M. et al. A new LH receptor splice mutation responsible for male hypogonadism with subnormal sperm production in the propositus, and infertility with regular cycles in an affected sister. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1917–23. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Song GJ, Park YS, Lee YS. et al. Alternatively spliced variants of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene in the testis of infertile men. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:499–504. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)03221-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Gromoll J, Gudermann T, Nieschlag E. Molecular cloning of a truncated isoform of the human follicle stimulating hormone receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;188:1077–83. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(92)91341-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Tena-Sempere M, Manna PR, Huhtaniemi I. Molecular cloning of the mouse follicle-stimulating hormone receptor complementary deoxyribonucleic acid: functional expression of alternatively spliced variants and receptor inactivation by a C566T transition in exon 7 of the coding sequence. Biol Reprod. 1999;60:1515–27. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod60.6.1515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.O'Hara L, Smith LB. Androgen receptor roles in spermatogenesis and infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;29:595–605. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2015.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Chang C, Chen YT, Yeh SD. et al. Infertility with defective spermatogenesis and hypotestosteronemia in male mice lacking the androgen receptor in Sertoli cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6876–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307306101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Denolet E, De Gendt K, Allemeersch J. et al. The effect of a sertoli cell-selective knockout of the androgen receptor on testicular gene expression in prepubertal mice. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20:321–34. doi: 10.1210/me.2005-0113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Lim P, Robson M, Spaliviero J. et al. Sertoli cell androgen receptor DNA binding domain is essential for the completion of spermatogenesis. Endocrinology. 2009;150:4755–65. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Cutress ML, Whitaker HC, Mills IG. et al. Structural basis for the nuclear import of the human androgen receptor. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:957–68. doi: 10.1242/jcs.022103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Jääskeläinen J, Mongan NP, Harland S. et al. Five novel androgen receptor gene mutations associated with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2006;27:291. doi: 10.1002/humu.9405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Wickert L, Selbig J. Structural analysis of the DNA-binding domain of alternatively spliced steroid receptors. J Endocrinol. 2002;173:429–36. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1730429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Sammarco I, Grimaldi P, Rossi P. et al. Novel point mutation in the splice donor site of exon-intron junction 6 of the androgen receptor gene in a patient with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:3256–61. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.9.6815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hellwinkel OJ, Holterhus PM, Struve D. et al. A unique exonic splicing mutation in the human androgen receptor gene indicates a physiologic relevance of regular androgen receptor transcript variants. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:2569–75. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.6.7543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Neto FT, Bach PV, Najari BB. et al. Spermatogenesis in humans and its affecting factors. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;59:10–26. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Cheng CY, Wong EW, Yan HH. et al. Regulation of spermatogenesis in the microenvironment of the seminiferous epithelium: new insights and advances. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;315:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ma TH, Xiong QH, Yuan B. et al. Luteinizing hormone receptor splicing variants in bovine Leydig cells. Genet Mol Res. 2012;11:1721–30. doi: 10.4238/2012.June.29.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Welsh M, Saunders PT, Atanassova N. et al. Androgen action via testicular peritubular myoid cells is essential for male fertility. FASEB Journal. 2009;23:4218–30. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-138347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Liu Q, Zhang X, Hu X. et al. Circular RNA related to the chondrocyte ECM regulates MMP13 expression by functioning as a MiR-136 'Sponge' in human cartilage degradation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22572. doi: 10.1038/srep22572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Zhang XO, Dong R, Zhang Y. et al. Diverse alternative back-splicing and alternative splicing landscape of circular RNAs. Genome Res. 2016;26:1277–87. doi: 10.1101/gr.202895.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Zhou F, Chen W, Jiang Y, Regulation of long non-coding RNAs and circular RNAs in spermatogonial stem cells. Reproduction; 2019. Apr 1. pii: REP-18-0517. R2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Gao Y, Wu M, Fan Y. et al. Identification and characterization of circular RNAs in Qinchuan cattle testis. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5:180413. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Zhou T, Xie X, Li M. et al. Rat BodyMap transcriptomes reveal unique circular RNA features across tissue types and developmental stages. RNA. 2018;24:1443–56. doi: 10.1261/rna.067132.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Dong WW, Li HM, Qing XR. et al. Identification and characterization of human testis derived circular RNAs and their existence in seminal plasma. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39080. doi: 10.1038/srep39080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Wang ET, Sandberg R, Luo S. et al. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature. 2008;456:470–6. doi: 10.1038/nature07509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Bondy-Chorney E, Crawford Parks TE, Ravel-Chapuis A. et al. Staufen1 regulates multiple alternative splicing events either positively or negatively in DM1 indicating its role as a disease modifier. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1005827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Zhou X, Wu W, Li H. et al. Transcriptome analysis of alternative splicing events regulated by SRSF10 reveals position-dependent splicing modulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:4019–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Ryan M, Wong WC, Brown R. et al. TCGASpliceSeq a compendium of alternative mRNA splicing in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D1018–22. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Cheng TL, Chen J, Wan H. et al. Regulation of mRNA splicing by MeCP2 via epigenetic modifications in the brain. Sci Rep. 2017;17:42790. doi: 10.1038/srep42790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Yan Q, Xia X, Sun Z. et al. Depletion of Arabidopsis SC35 and SC35-like serine/arginine-rich proteins affects the transcription and splicing of a subset of genes. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Ivyspring International Publisher

RESOURCES