Table 2.
Factor | HCT-116 | A549 | HeLa | MDA-MB-231 | ARPE-19 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(% Viability) | |||||
ANOVA 1 | |||||
Rootstock | NS | *** | ** | NS | *** |
Irrigation | NS | NS | NS | NS | *** |
Rootstock × Irrigation | NS | *** | *** | NS | *** |
Tukey multiple range test 2 | |||||
Rootstock | |||||
P. atlantica | 38.9 | 67.4 a | 30.1 a | 61.3 | 94.2 a |
P. integerrima | 39.0 | 68.3 a | 30.1 a | 61.9 | 87.9 b |
P. terebinthus | 43.4 | 68.7 a | 32.3 a | 60.3 | 86.6 b |
CISP 3 | 40.2 | 61.1 b | 28.2 b | 57.2 | 69.2 c |
Irrigation | |||||
T0 | 39.7 | 65.3 | 28.3 | 58.0 | 91.7 a |
T1 | 39.8 | 64.4 | 27.0 | 60.8 | 87.7 a |
T2 | 40.9 | 61.1 | 28.2 | 61.0 | 89.3 a |
CISP 3 | 40.2 | 61.1 | 28.2 | 57.2 | 69.2 b |
Rootstock × Irrigation | |||||
P. atlantica × T0 | 36.1 | 73.2 a | 30.1 a | 62.5 | 99.1 a |
P. atlantica × T1 | 35.8 | 66.2 a | 29.3 a | 60.9 | 91.1 a |
P. atlantica × T2 | 44.3 | 64.6 ab | 30.4 a | 59.6 | 90.9 a |
P. integerrima × T0 | 36.3 | 74.5 a | 28.4 ab | 55.5 | 84.9 ab |
P. integerrima × T1 | 41.0 | 67.2 a | 31.5 a | 64.6 | 88.3 ab |
P. integerrima × T2 | 38.8 | 65.1 ab | 29.6 a | 64.9 | 90.6 a |
P. terebinthus × T0 | 46.7 | 63.7 ab | 34.8 a | 58.9 | 90.1 a |
P. terebinthus × T1 | 42.7 | 75.3 a | 28.8 ab | 59.8 | 83.8 ab |
P. terebinthus × T2 | 39.9 | 69.1 a | 33.3 a | 61.3 | 86.2 ab |
CISP 3 | 40.2 | 61.1 b | 28.2 b | 57.2 | 69.2 b |
Pooled variance | 4.1 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 4.5 |
1. NS: not significant at p < 0.05; **, and ***, significant at p < 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.2. Values (mean of 3 replications) followed by the same letter, within the same column and factor, were not significantly different (p < 0.05), Tukey’s least significant difference test. 3. Cisplatin (CISP) concentration was 50 µg mL−1 for all the cell lines studied, except for MDA-MB-231 in which case the concentration was 100 µg mL−1.