Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 16;2019:3108950. doi: 10.1155/2019/3108950

Table 4.

Overall comparison of compressed size and the relative gain for different methods under different reference genomes.

Reference Original file size (MB) Compressed file size (MB) by
iDoComp GDC2 ERGC NRGC HiRGC SCCG HRCM-S HRCM-B
hg17 20,966.28 517.43 1570.94 2220.85 1952.05 103.62 89.09 99.66 80.13
84.51% 94.90% 96.39% 95.90% 22.67% 10.06% 19.60%
hg18 20,962.74 506.75 1564.89 1498.22 1237.86 97.27 82.05 96.55 77.89
84.63% 95.02% 94.80% 93.71% 19.92% 5.07% 19.32%
hg19 20,947.88 581.90 1610.37 1826.78 1179.24 95.57 81.56 90.89 77.43
86.69% 95.19% 95.76% 93.43% 18.98% 5.07% 14.81%
hg38 20,955.10 526.98 1659.51 1708.70 1247.31 96.78 81.93 96.73 75.38
85.70% 95.46% 95.59% 93.96% 22.11% 7.99% 22.07%
K131 20,972.50 1338.91 1570.45 1874.15 1172.16 124.20 108.53 132.50 91.80
93.14% 94.15% 95.10% 92.17% 26.08% 15.42% 30.71%
K224 20,972.51 1284.20 1540.93 1897.95 1172.65 124.97 109.44 133.70 93.56
92.71% 93.93% 95.07% 92.02% 25.13% 14.50% 30.02%
YH 20,972.51 399.29 1643.71 1840.61 1171.03 128.47 113.26 134.50 93.38
76.61% 94.32% 94.93% 92.03% 27.31% 17.56% 30.58%
HuRef 20,965.32 824.15 1501.46 2911.90 2295.88 146.15 129.33 152.50 97.41
88.18% 93.51% 96.65% 95.76% 33.35% 24.68% 36.13%

Bold indicates the best value of the case.