TABLE 1.
Biomarker | Specimen | Application | Remark | |||||||||
Sputum | Body fluids | CSF | Blood/serum/plasma | PBMC | Mtb diagnosis | Distinguish active TB vs. LTBI | Monitoring | Predict relapse/worsen/progress | Predict treatment success | |||
Microbiology technique | AFB staining | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Rapid, convenient and inexpensive test | ||||
– Non-specific, must accompanied with confirmation tests | ||||||||||||
– Limited sensitivity; required at least 5000 AFB/mL to be detected | ||||||||||||
– High false negative rate | ||||||||||||
Mtb culture | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Long turnaround time (3–8 weeks) | |||||
– Required biosafety level three facilities to handle Mtb culture | ||||||||||||
Detection of Mtb components | Mtb DNA detection (GeneEpert) | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Rapid, diagnosis, and detection of drug resistant Mtb | ||||
– Low sensitivity (49–72%) | ||||||||||||
– Patient positive with Mtb in blood assoc. with increased risk of death | ||||||||||||
Mtb antigens ∙ LAM |
∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Low sensitivity (13–93%) | ||||||||
– Use to monitor anti-TB response in TB-HIV | ||||||||||||
– co-infected patients | ||||||||||||
– Predict TB-IRIS and death among TB-HIV co-infected patients | ||||||||||||
Mtb antigens ∙ Ag 85 complex, ESAT-6, CFP-10, MPT64 |
∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Sensitivity is in consistent Poor specificity | |||||||
Digital PCR (dPCR) | ∙ | ∙ | – Supreme sensitivity then conventional qPCR | |||||||||
– Twofold higher sensitivity than GeneXpert in detecting MTB among probable/possible TB meningitis | ||||||||||||
– The study uses CSF, but can be apply for sputum, serum/plasma and other body fluid | ||||||||||||
Host antibodies responses against ex-vivo stimulation of Mtb Ags | PPD, Ag60, ESAT-6, CFP-10 | ∙ | ∙ | – Poor sensitivity (14–85%); poor specificity (53–98%) | ||||||||
– Antibody response usually very low among children | ||||||||||||
RV0310c-E | ∙ | ∙ | – Better sensitivity than ESAT-6 and CFP-10 | |||||||||
RV1255c-E | ||||||||||||
P12037 | ∙ | ∙ | – Sensitivity = 92%, specificity = 91% | |||||||||
PPE17 | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – More antigenic antigen than ESAt-6 and CFP-10 | |||||||
MDP-1 | ||||||||||||
RV2031c, RV1408, RV2421c | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – IgG against these three Ags were initial identified by screening done by proteomics | ||||||||
Host cytokines responses against ex-vivo stimulation of MTB Ags | Tuberculin skin test (TST) | – | – | – | – | – | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Poor sensitivity among HIV/immunocompromised patients | ||
Ag: ESAT-6, CFP-10 IFN-γ (IGRA) | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – T-SPOT sensitivity (91.2%); QuantiFERON sensitivity (80.2%) | ||||||
– More specific than TST | ||||||||||||
– Less affected by HIV-status compared to TST | ||||||||||||
– Predict TB-reactivation within 2 years | ||||||||||||
– Associated with complete clinical and microbiological recovery | ||||||||||||
Ag: ESAT-6, CFP-10 IP-10 | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – High IP-10 in unstimulated tube associated with active TB | ||||||||
– Less affected by HIV status | ||||||||||||
Ag: ESAT-6, CFP-10 sCD14, MD-2, LPS | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Distinguish between active-TB and LTBI | |||||||
– Levels correlated with treatment success | ||||||||||||
Ag: ESAT-6, CFP-10 IL-8, MIP-1a, sIL-2Ra, VEGF, MCP-3 | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | |||||||||
Ag: ESAT-6, CFP-10 IL-6, MCP-1, VEGF, HO-1, MMP, IL-11R antagonist, 2-antiplasmin | ∙ | ∙ | ||||||||||
Host cytokines responses against ex-vivo stimulation of MTB Ags | Ag: ESAT-6, CFP-10 ratio of IL-2/IFN-γ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ||||||||
Ag: ESAT-6, CFP-10 eotaxin, CCL22, MCP-1 | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – When used in combination, the sensitivity = 87.8% and specificity = 91.8% | ||||||||
Ag: DosR, RV2029c, Rpf, RV2389c IFN-γ (IGRA) | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Both DosR and Rpf are antigen expressed during latent infection | |||||||
– When used in combination, the sensitivity = 90% and specificity = 85% | ||||||||||||
Host cellular immune responses against ex-vivo stimulation of Mtb antigens | CD4 + CD69 + IFN-γ+ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Associate with early or recent Tb-infection | |||||||
CD4 + IFN-γ + IL-2 + TEM | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Associated with LTBI | ||||||||
CD4 + IL-2 + TCM | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Associated with LTBI | ||||||||
CD4 + IFN-γ + TEMRA | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Associated with active TB-infection | |||||||
– Shift of functional signature from CD4 + IFN-γ + TEMRA to CD4 + IFN-γ + IL-2 + TEM after completion of ATT indicate successful treatment | ||||||||||||
CD4 + IFN-γ + IL-2 + TNF-α+ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Associated with active TB-infection | |||||||
CD4 + IFN-γ + IL-2+ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Associated with active LTBI | |||||||
CD4 + IFN-γ+ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Associated with active LTBI | |||||||
– Shift of functional signature from CD4 + IFN-γ + TNF-α + to CD4 + IFN-γ + IL-2 + or CD4 + IFN-γ + after completion of ATT indicate successful treatment | ||||||||||||
TEM TCM | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – High TEM at sixth months of ATT assoc. with TB reactivation | ||||||||
– High TCM at sixth months of ATT assoc. with complete clearance of TB | ||||||||||||
CD4 + CD27+ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Differentiate between active TB and LTBI | ||||||||
– High CD4 + CD27 + associated with active TB | ||||||||||||
– Intermediate CD4 + CD27+ associated with LTBI | ||||||||||||
CD137 + T-cells | ∙ | ∙ | – Is a member of TNF receptor superfamily | |||||||||
Associated with active TB | ||||||||||||
IL-10 + Th17 | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Associated with LTBI, when stimulated with DosR | ||||||||
IFN-γ + Th17 | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Associated with active TB, when stimulated with DosR | ||||||||
%BDCA3 + mDC | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Reduction in% indicated active TB infection | ||||||||
%CD123 + pDC | ||||||||||||
MFI BDCA3 + mDC | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Increase activation markers in these subsets indicated LTBI | ||||||||
MFI CD123 + pDC | ||||||||||||
CD38, HLA-DR | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Used for monitoring of time to culture conversion after initiation of anti-TB therapy | ||||||||
– Slope of reduction in CD38 and HLA-DR correlated with time to culture conversion | ||||||||||||
Treg | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Low% of Treg found among rapid responder | ||||||||
– Percentage of Treg inversely correlated with time to culture conversion | ||||||||||||
Genomics, transcriptomic, proteomics, and metabolomics | ∙ Neutrophil derived IFN-γ, IFN-α and β | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Further validations required | |||||||
∙ FcγR1B | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Further validations required | ||||||||
∙ Lacto transferrin CD64, RIN3 | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Further validations required | ||||||||
circRNA _103017, _059914, _101128, _062400 | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Covalently closed circular RNA, highly resistant to RNase, hence presence in abundance in cytoplasm | ||||||||
– Increase in these three circRNAs is associated with LTBI | ||||||||||||
– Decreased in this circRNA is associated with active TB infection | ||||||||||||
host miRNA | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Increase in these miRNA is associated with active TB infection | ||||||||
_hsa-miR-146a-5p | ||||||||||||
_hsa-miR-125b-5p | ||||||||||||
MTB miRNA | ||||||||||||
_MTB-miR5 | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | |||||||||
Host miRNA | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Elevation of these miRNA were associated with LTBI | ||||||||
_hsa-let-7e-5p | ||||||||||||
_hsa-let-7d-5p | ||||||||||||
_hsa-miR-450a-5p | ||||||||||||
_hsa-miR-140-5p | ||||||||||||
Host miRNA | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Elevation of these miRNA were | ||||||||
_hsa-miR-1246 | ||||||||||||
_ hsa-miR-2110 | – associated with active TB infection | |||||||||||
_ hsa-miR-370-3p | ||||||||||||
_ hsa-miR-28-3p | ||||||||||||
_ hsa-miR-193b-5p | ||||||||||||
Host proteomics | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | – Elevation of these plasma markers were associated with severe TB infection | ||||||||
ORM2, IL-36α, | ||||||||||||
S1000-A9, SOD | ||||||||||||
Host metabolomics ∙ Cortisol, tryptophan, glutathione, tRNA acylation | ∙ | ∙ | – Predict progression from LTBI to active TB (applicable to host hold contact of TB infected individual) | |||||||||
Host genomics ∙ SNP of SP110 gene (rs9061) |
∙ | ∙ | – SP100 gene encoding for IFN induced nuclear protein | |||||||||
– Individual bearing this SNP was associated lower plasma level of TNF and increase susceptibility to LTBI |