TABLE 4.
Number of methods that were indicative of bias within meta-analyses according to effect direction.
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Crude differences (k = 29) | |||||
| Declines | 6(40%) | 5(33%) | 2(13%) | 2(13%) | 0(0%) |
| Increases | 2(22%) | 4(44%) | 2(22%) | 0(0%) | 1(11%) |
| Proteus | 1(20%) | 2(40%) | 0(0%) | 1(20%) | 1(20%) |
| Regression coefficients (k = 24) | |||||
| Declines | 6(40%) | 6(40%) | 2(13%) | 0(0%) | 1(7%) |
| Increases | 2(22%) | 3(33%) | 2(22%) | 2(22%) | 0(0%) |
k Declines = 15, k Increases = 9, and k Proteus = 5. Within-row percentages refer to absolute study number of the respective effect trajectory.