Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 26.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014 Jan;61(1):62–75. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2014.6689776

Table III.

Means ± standard deviations and coefficients of variation (COV = standard deviation / mean, in parentheses expressed as a percentage) for acoustic pulse parameters for hydrophones obtained using the traditional scaling method (“Scale”), the traditional scaling method plus low-pass filtering (“Scale+LPF”), and using deconvolution based on the magnitude of the sensitivity (“Mag”), the direct measurement of the complex sensitivity (“Direct”), and the minimum phase estimate of the complex sensitivity (“MP”).

Method p+ (MPa) p (MPa) PII (mJ/cm2)
All hydrophones Scale 6.0 ± 1.7 (29%) 2.6 ± 1.0 (39%) 0.29 ± 0.17 (58%)
Scale+LPF 5.5 ± 1.6 (30%) 2.5 ± 0.9 (35%) 0.27 ± 0.15 (55%)
Mag 4.7 ± 0.3 (7%) 2.5 ± 0.4 (16%) 0.21 ± 0.02 (10%)
Direct 4.8 ± 0.4 (8%) 2.4 ± 0.3 (13%) 0.21 ± 0.02 (10%)
MP 4.9 ± 0.7 (14%) 2.5 ± 0.4 (16%) 0.21 ± 0.02 (10%)
All hydrophones except fiber-optic hydrophone Scale 5.5 ± 1.1 (20%) 2.3 ± 0.4 (17%) 0.23 ± 0.05 (22%)
Scale+LPF 5.0 ± 1.0 (20%) 2.2 ± 0.4 (17%) 0.22 ± 0.05 (22%)
Mag 4.8 ± 0.3 (7%) 2.5 ± 0.4 (18%) 0.21 ± 0.02 (10%)
Direct 4.8 ± 0.4 (8%) 2.4 ± 0.2 (9%) 0.21 ± 0.02 (10%)
MP 4.9 ± 0.8 (15%) 2.5 ± 0.4 (17%) 0.21 ± 0.02 (10%)