Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 12;2015(11):CD009464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009464.pub2

Summary of findings 1. Cannabinoids compared with placebo for chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting.

Cannabinoids compared with placebo for chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting
Patient or population: people with chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting
Intervention: cannabinoids
Comparison: placebo
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) No of participants
(studies) Quality of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Placebo Cannabinoids
Absence of nausea
(follow‐up)
3 per 100 6 per 100
(1 to 63)
RR 2.0 (0.2 to 21) 96
(2) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3,5 RR > 1 indicates treatment favours cannabinoids
Absence of vomiting
(follow‐up)
6 per 100 34 per 100
(16 to 76)
RR 5.7 (2.6 to 12.6) 168
(3) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3,5 RR > 1 indicates treatment favours cannabinoids
Absence of nausea and vomiting
(follow‐up)
11 per 100 32 per 100
(20 to 52)
RR 2.9 (1.8 to 4.7) 288
(3) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate3 RR > 1 indicates treatment favours cannabinoids
Participant preference
(follow‐up)
Low‐risk value2 RR 4.8 (1.7 to 13) 256
(2) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3,4 RR > 1 indicates treatment favours cannabinoids
8 per 100 38 per 100
(14 to 104)
High‐risk value2
22 per 100 106
(37 to 286)
Withdrawal any reason
(follow‐up)
10 per 1000 3 per 1000
(0.1 to 7)
RR 0.31 (0.01 to 7) 33
(1) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,3,5 RR < 1 indicates treatment favours cannabinoids
Withdrawal due to adverse event
(follow‐up)
80 per 1000 4 per 1000
(0.0 to 72)
RR 6.9 (1.96 to 24) 276
(2) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,3,5
RR < 1 indicates treatment favours cannabinoids
*The assumed risk for all outcomes is the median control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Sparse data.

2 The low‐ and high‐risk values are the two extreme proportions of people with a preference for one drug over another.

3 Limitations in the design (cross‐over study) and high attrition.

4 Unexplained heterogeneity.

5 Imprecision.