Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 12;2015(11):CD009464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009464.pub2

Frytak 1979.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomised, double‐blind, parallel group trial
Participants 116 people, median age = 61 years. All cannabis naive. THC n = 38 (22 men/16 women), prochlorperazine n = 41 (21 men/20 women), placebo n = 37 (27 men/10 women)
Tumour types: colorectal cancer (28 people), gastric cancer (7 people), liver cancer (2 people), miscellaneous (1 person), gastric surgery (5 people), hepatic metastasis (20 people)
Chemotherapy regimens: 5‐fluorouracil and semustine or 5‐fluorouracil and semustine plus triazinate, razoxane, doxorubicin or vincristine. 5‐fluorouracil 300‐350 mg/m2 IV for 5 days. Semustine 110‐175 mg/m2 day 1 only
Chemotherapy emetogenicity: moderate
Interventions Dronabinol 15 mg on day 1, 2 hours prior to chemotherapy, then 2 and 8 hours after initiation of chemotherapy. Then 3 times daily x 3 days orally, n = 38
Prochlorperazine 10 mg on day 1, 2 hours prior to chemotherapy, then 2 and 8 hours after initiation of chemotherapy. Then 3 times daily x 3 days orally, n = 41
Placebo n = 37
Outcomes Episodes of nausea and vomiting during 24 hours, sedation, feeling high; withdrawal due to intolerable central nervous system toxicity or excessive vomiting
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Table of random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Drugs dispensed in individual packets identified by code number
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Only 1/117 (0.8%) participants withdrew. After day 1, 10/38 (26%) participants withdrew in THC group, 5/41 (12%) participants withdrew in prochlorperazine group, 3/37 (8%) participants withdrew in placebo group
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Data reported for primary outcome
Other bias Low risk Groups were balanced at baseline
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk "Identical opaque gelatin capsules"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Blinding assumed as study reported as "double‐blind"