Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 4;23(6):e12580. doi: 10.1111/anec.12580

Table 2.

Number of patients with > 20% myocardium at risk assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and grouped by electrocardiographic ST‐elevation distribution

Segment number Myocardial segment ECG STE distribution p value
With aVL STE (n, %) Without aVL STE (n, %)
1 Basal anterior 7 (54) 2 (11) 0.011
2 Basal anteroseptal 7 (54) 3 (16) 0.05
3 Basal inferoseptal 1 (8) 1 (5) 0.66
4 Basal inferior 0 (0) 0 (0) 1
5 Basal inferolateral 0 (0) 0 (0) 1
6 Basal anterolateral 0 (0) 0 (0) 1
7 Mid anterior 12 (92) 15 (79) 0.31
8 Mid anteroseptal 12 (92) 18 (95) 0.66
9 Mid inferoseptal 9 (69) 11 (58) 0.71
10 Mid inferior 0 (0%) 1 (5) 1
11 Mid inferolateral 0 (0) 0 (0) 1
12 Mid anterolateral 5 (38) 2 (11) 0.08
13 Apical anterior 13 (100) 18 (95) 1
14 Apical septal 13 (100) 19 (100) 1
15 Apical inferior 8 (62) 18 (95) 0.029
16 Apical lateral 9 (69) 7 (37) 0.15
17 Apex 13 (100) 19 (100) 1

ECG: electrocardiogram; STE: ST‐elevation.