Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 4;23(6):e12580. doi: 10.1111/anec.12580

Table 4.

Comparison of mean late gadolinium enhancement assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging among the myocardial segments with and without avL ST‐elevation

Segment number Myocardial segment ECG STE distribution p value
With aVL STE (LGE %) Without aVL STE (LGE %)
1 Basal anterior 4.6 ± 5.7 1.7 ± 3.6 0.10
2 Basal anteroseptal 11.9 ± 12.3 5.7 ± 11 0.16
3 Basal inferoseptal 2.2 ± 5.4 0.94 ± 3.5 0.45
4 Basal inferior 0 ± 0 0.26 ± 1.1 0.39
5 Basal inferolateral 0.036 ± 0.13 0 ± 0 0.26
6 Basal anterolateral 0.60 ± 1.6 0 ± 0 0.13
7 Mid anterior 32 ± 24 18 ± 16 0.06
8 Mid anteroseptal 37 ± 23 34 ± 21 0.66
9 Mid inferoseptal 9.7 ± 9.1 12 ± 16 0.65
10 Mid inferior 0.0033 ± 0.012 2.1 ± 5.2 0.18
11 Mid inferolateral 1.5 ± 5.0 0 ± 0 0.23
12 Mid anterolateral 8.1 ± 14 1.3 ± 2.8 0.06
13 Apical anterior 40 ± 22 32 ± 18 0.27
14 Apical septal 45 ± 23 55 ± 15 0.19
15 Apical inferior 11 ± 12 28 ± 21 0.02
16 Apical lateral 13 ± 18 6.2 ± 9.0 0.17
17 Apex 43 ± 24 52 ± 19 0.26

CMR: cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG: electrocardiogram; LGE: late gadolinium enhancement; STE: ST‐elevation.